...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Artificial General Intelligence >Editorial: Cognitive Architectures, Model Comparison and AGI
【24h】

Editorial: Cognitive Architectures, Model Comparison and AGI

机译:社论:认知架构,模型比较和AGI

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Editorial: Cognitive Architectures, Model Comparison and AGICognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence share compatible goals of understanding and possibly generating broadly intelligent behavior. In order to determine if progress is made, it is essential to be able to evaluate the behavior of complex computational models, especially those built on general cognitive architectures, and compare it to benchmarks of intelligent behavior such as human performance. Significant methodological challenges arise, however, when trying to extend approaches used to compare model and human performance from tightly controlled laboratory tasks to complex tasks involving more open-ended behavior. This paper describes a model comparison challenge built around a dynamic control task, the Dynamic Stocks and Flows. We present and discuss distinct approaches to evaluating performance and comparing models. Lessons drawn from this challenge are discussed in light of the challenge of using cognitive architectures to achieve Artificial General Intelligence.
机译:社论:认知架构,模型比较以及AGIC认知科学和人工智能具有兼容的理解目标,并可能产生广泛的智能行为。为了确定是否取得了进展,至关重要的是能够评估复杂的计算模型的行为,尤其是那些基于通用认知体系结构的模型,并将其与诸如人类绩效之类的智能行为基准进行比较。但是,当试图将用于比较模型和人类绩效的方法从严格控制的实验室任务扩展到涉及更多开放性行为的复杂任务时,方法学上出现了重大挑战。本文描述了围绕动态控制任务,动态库存和流量构建的模型比较挑战。我们提出并讨论了评估性能和比较模型的不同方法。针对使用认知体系结构实现人工智能的挑战,讨论了从这一挑战中汲取的教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号