首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare >Effectiveness of Split-Plot Design over Randomized Complete Block Design in Some Experiments
【24h】

Effectiveness of Split-Plot Design over Randomized Complete Block Design in Some Experiments

机译:在某些实验中,分割图设计对随机完整模块设计的有效性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

One of the main features that distinguish split-plot experiments from other experiments is that they involve two types of experimental errors; the whole plot (WP) error and the split-plot (SP) error. This research paper compared the effectiveness of split-plot design (SPD) over randomized complete block design (RCBD). The data used for comparison is a 21 x 52 split-plot experiment with three replicates. It is been carried out to evaluate the threshing efficiency of an improved sorghum thresher; the three factors considered in the experiment are the feed at two different rates, moisture content at five different levels and speed at five different rates. The data is analyzed as split-plot and as randomized complete block design and their ANOVA results and relative efficiency (RE) statistic values were compared. The result reveals the effectiveness of split-plot design over randomized complete block design. Key words: SPD, SP error, WP error, RCBD, Relative Efficiency
机译:将分裂图实验与其他实验区分开来的主要特征之一是,它们涉及两种类型的实验误差。整个图(WP)错误和拆分图(SP)错误。该研究论文比较了分割图设计(SPD)与随机完整块设计(RCBD)的有效性。用于比较的数据是具有三个重复的21 x 52分割图实验。已经进行了评估改进的高粱脱粒机的脱粒效率。实验中考虑的三个因素是两种不同速率的饲料,五个不同水平的水分含量和五个不同速率的速度。将数据作为分割图和随机完整块设计进行分析,并对它们的ANOVA结果和相对效率(RE)统计值进行比较。结果揭示了分割图设计相对于随机完整模块设计的有效性。关键词:SPD,SP误差,WP误差,RCBD,相对效率

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号