首页> 外文期刊>Journal of analytical research in clinical medicine. >Noninvasive haemodynamic monitoring and hypotension management with transesophageal duplex among mechanically-ventilated patients: An analytical study
【24h】

Noninvasive haemodynamic monitoring and hypotension management with transesophageal duplex among mechanically-ventilated patients: An analytical study

机译:机械通气患者经食管双工的无创血流动力学监测和低血压管理:一项分析研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Central venous (CV) line is one of the most common methods of central venous pressure (CVP) measurement and hemodynamic monitoring among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, its complications are not rare and are life-threatening in some cases. Recently, transesophageal duplex is frequently used to monitor the cardiac output (CO) and intravascular fluid volume of patients admitted to ICU. The present study was conducted aiming to assess noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring and hypotension management with transesophageal doppler among mechanically-ventilated patients. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 25 patients admitted to the ICU of Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran, were studied. CV line had been inserted into the body of the patients prior to the study for various reasons. CO was measured using esophageal duplex and also transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and CVP was determined via esophageal duplex and CV line findings. Results: Mean CO of the patients was 4.88 ± 0.61 and 4.86 ± 0.59 l/minute measured by esophageal duplex and TTE, respectively. Hence, the difference was not statistically significant between the two methods. The mean CVPs of the patients measured by esophageal duplex and CV line were 4.94 ± 1.15 and 4.54 ± 1.04 mmHg, respectively. In addition, the left ventricular (LV) filling pressure measured by Oesophageal Doppler Monitoring (ODM) and by TTE was 9.28 ± 2.66 and 9.28 ± 2.66 mmHg, respectively. The difference for both of the mentioned variables was statistically significant but clinically negligible. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, esophageal duplex as a less invasive, safe and precise method can replace the use of CV line among patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. This will help clinicians to obtain accurate haemodynamic data from critically ill patients and avoid unexpected complications imposed by CV line insertion.
机译:简介:在重症监护病房(ICU)的患者中,中心静脉(CV)线是最常用的中心静脉压(CVP)测量和血液动力学监测方法之一。但是,它的并发症并不罕见,并且在某些情况下会危及生命。近来,经食道双工经常被用来监测接受ICU的患者的心输出量(CO)和血管内液量。本研究旨在评估机械通气患者的经食道多普勒无创血流动力学监测和低血压管理。方法:在该描述性横断面研究中,研究了25例入院于伊朗大不里士Imam Reza医院ICU的患者。由于各种原因,在研究之前已将CV线插入患者体内。使用食管双工和经胸超声心动图(TTE)测量CO,并通过食管双工和CV线发现确定CVP。结果:通过食管双工和TTE测量,患者的平均CO分别为4.88±0.61和4.86±0.59 l / min。因此,两种方法之间的差异在统计上并不显着。通过食管双工和CV线测量的患者的平均CVP分别为4.94±1.15和4.54±1.04mmHg。此外,通过食道多普勒监测(ODM)和TTE测量的左心室(LV)充盈压分别为9.28±2.66和9.28±2.66 mmHg。上述两个变量的差异具有统计学意义,但临床上可忽略不计。结论:根据这项研究的结果,食管双工是一种微创,安全和精确的方法,可以代替机械通气患者使用CV线。这将有助于临床医生从重症患者那里获得准确的血液动力学数据,并避免因CV线插入而引起的意外并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号