...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology >Randomized double-blind comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using total intravenous anesthesia
【24h】

Randomized double-blind comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using total intravenous anesthesia

机译:全静脉麻醉下腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者瑞芬太尼和阿芬太尼的随机双盲比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and Aims: To compare the use of remifentanil and alfentanil to suppress intraoperative adrenergic response of pain and the influence of these drugs on the recovery profile in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) technique. Material and Methods: One hundred patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to be managed with either remifentanil (group R) or alfentanil (group A). During general anesthesia, we evaluated adrenergic responses to intubation to first surgical incision and over the surgical procedure. We also recorded time to first spontaneous breathing, time to successful ventilation, time to respond to verbal orders, and time to extubation. Results: The R group reported a significantly lower number of responses to intubation and responses to first surgical incision (14% vs. 30%; P = 0.013 and 8% vs. 18%; P = 0,037, respectively). The event of one or more responses during the surgical procedure was also lower in the R group (56% vs. 70%; P = 0.017). Hypertensive response to surgical stimuli during the procedure was lower in the R group as well as a lower frequency of tachycardia episodes in this group (34% vs. 56%; P = 0.033 and 28% vs. 44%; P = 0.041, respectively). No differences were found between groups relating to the percentage of hypotensive episodes and no episodes of bradycardia were appreciated. Both groups were similar relating to recovery times: time to the first spontaneous breathing, time to successful ventilation, time to respond to verbal orders, and time to extubation. Conclusion: Remifentanil showed a more stable hemodynamic response during the surgery compared with the use of alfentanil in anesthetized patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using TIVA. Both opioids, alfentanil and remifentanil, have a similar recovery profile, and they do not delay time to awakening.
机译:背景与目的:比较使用瑞芬太尼和阿芬太尼抑制使用全静脉麻醉(TIVA)技术进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者术中疼痛的肾上腺素能反应以及这些药物对恢复曲线的影响。材料与方法:随机将接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的一百例患者接受瑞芬太尼(R组)或阿芬太尼(A组)治疗。在全身麻醉期间,我们评估了对首次手术切口和整个手术过程中插管的肾上腺素能反应。我们还记录了首次自发呼吸的时间,通气成功的时间,对口头命令做出反应的时间以及拔管的时间。结果:R组报告对插管的反应和对首次手术切口的反应明显较少(分别为14%vs. 30%; P = 0.013和8%vs. 18%; P = 0,037)。在R组中,手术过程中一种或多种反应的发生率也较低(56%vs. 70%; P = 0.017)。 R组在手术过程中对手术刺激的高血压反应较低,而该组中心动过速发作的频率较低(分别为34%对56%; P = 0.033和28%对44%; P = 0.041 )。两组之间未发现有关降压发作百分比的差异,也未发现心动过缓发作。两组患者的恢复时间相似:第一次自发呼吸的时间,通气成功的时间,对口头命令做出反应的时间以及拔管的时间。结论:与使用阿芬太尼相比,在使用TIVA进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的麻醉患者中,瑞芬太尼在手术过程中显示出更稳定的血液动力学反应。两种阿片类药物(阿芬太尼和瑞芬太尼)具有相似的恢复特征,并且它们不会延迟唤醒时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号