首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science and Technology >Evaluation of dry feeding and liquid feeding to lactating sows under high temperature environment
【24h】

Evaluation of dry feeding and liquid feeding to lactating sows under high temperature environment

机译:高温环境下泌乳母猪干饲和液体饲喂的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Liquid feeding system has been introduced to domestic swine farms, but negative cognition about liquid feeding system has been remained for feed waste decay related with poor management and microbial contamination. For these reasons, this study was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding method in lactating sows. Methods A total of 30 mixed-parity (average 4.13) lactating sows (Yorkshire?×?Landrace) with an initial BW of 218.8?±?19.5kg was used in a 3 week trial. Sows were allotted to 1 of 2 treatments in a completely randomized design by their body weight, backfat thickness, parity and alive litter weight. One of treatments was dry feeding and the other was liquid feeding (water to feed ratio, 1:1). Experimental diets contained 3265 kcal ME/kg, 12.6 % CP, 5.76 % EE, 1.09 % total lysine, 0.25 % total methionine, as fed basis. Results Dry feeding treatment had high body weight loss rather than liquid feeding treatment ( P =?0.04). Dry feeding treatment had tendency to increase litter weight at 21d of lactation ( P =?0.06) and litter weight gain ( P =?0.04) during lactation period (0–3 week). Sows fed dry feeding method made milk containing high content of casein and total solid rather than sows fed liquid feeding method ( P =?0.04). In addition, dry feeding treatment had tendency to higher content of milk fat, protein and solid not fat on 21d of lactation ( P =?0.07). Sows fed dry feeding type also showed higher milk energy content in milk of 21d lactation ( P =?0.05). Furthermore, liquid feeding treatment showed high occurrence in feed waste during lactation period ( P Conclusion Dry feeding method was more suitable feeding method to lactating sows under high temperature environment like lactating barn.
机译:液体饲喂系统已被引入家庭养猪场,但是对于由于管理不善和微生物污染而导致的饲料废物腐烂,人们仍然对液体饲喂系统持负面认识。由于这些原因,本研究旨在评估饲喂方法对泌乳母猪的影响。方法在为期3周的试验中,总共使用30头(平均4.13)混合胎(约克郡××大腿),初始体重为218.8±19.5kg。将母猪的体重,后脂肪厚度,胎次和活产仔猪体重按完全随机设计分配给2种处理之一。处理之一是干喂,另一种是液体喂(水与饲料的比例为1:1)。实验日粮含3265 kcal ME / kg,CP为12.6%,EE为5.76%,总赖氨酸为1.09%,蛋氨酸为0.25%。结果干饲比液体饲喂有更高的体重减轻(P =?0.04)。在哺乳期21d,干饲处理有增加仔猪体重的趋势(P =?0.06),在哺乳期(0-3周)有增加仔猪体重的趋势(P =?0.04)。用干饲法喂养的母猪制成的酪蛋白含量和总固体含量高,而不是用液体饲喂法喂养的母猪(P = 0.04)。另外,在哺乳期21天,干饲处理趋向于增加乳脂,蛋白质和固体而非脂肪的含量(P = 0.07)。饲喂干饲的母猪在21d泌乳期的乳汁中也显示出较高的乳汁能量含量(P =?0.05)。此外,在泌乳期,液体饲喂处理在饲料废物中的发生率很高(P结论干饲法是泌乳母猪等高温环境下更适合哺乳母猪的饲喂方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号