首页> 外文期刊>JAOA: The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association >Targeting Patient Subgroups With Chronic Low Back Pain for Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: Responder Analyses From a Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Targeting Patient Subgroups With Chronic Low Back Pain for Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: Responder Analyses From a Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:针对慢性腰背痛进行整骨疗法的患者亚组:随机对照试验的响应者分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is often used to treat patients with low back pain (LBP). Objective: To identify subgroups of patients with chronic LBP who achieve medium to large treatment effects with OMT based on responder analyses involving pain and functioning outcomes from the OSTEOPAThic Health outcomes In Chronic low back pain (OSTEOPATHIC) Trial. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial involving 455 patients in Dallas-Fort Worth was conducted from 2006 to 2011. A 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) for LBP intensity and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) for back-specific functioning were used to assess primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Substantial improvement was defined as 50% or greater reduction at week 12 compared with baseline. Cumulative distribution functions for the RR and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) were used to assess response. Results: Medium treatment effects for LBP intensity were observed overall (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.76; P=.002; NNT, 6.9; 95% CI, 4.3-18.6). However, large treatment effects were observed in patients with baseline VAS scores of 35 mm or greater. Although OMT was not associated with overall substantial improvement in back-specific functioning, patients with baseline RMDQ scores of 7 or greater experienced medium effects, and patients with baseline scores 16 or greater experienced large effects that were significant. The OMT effects for LBP intensity and back-specific functioning were independent of baseline patient demographic characteristics, comorbid medical conditions, and medication use for LBP during the trial. Conclusions: Subgrouping according to baseline levels of chronic LBP intensity and back-specific functioning appears to be a simple strategy for identifying sizeable numbers of patients who achieve substantial improvement with OMT and may thereby be less likely to use more costly and invasive interventions. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00315120)
机译:背景:整骨疗法(OMT)通常用于治疗腰痛(LBP)的患者。目的:根据涉及OSTEOPA的疼痛和功能预后的反应者分析,确定通过OMT实现中到大型治疗效果的慢性LBP患者亚组。慢性下背痛(OSTEOPATHIC)试验中的“健康结果”。方法:该随机,双盲,假对照试验于2006年至2011年在Dallas-Fort Worth进行,涉及455名患者。LBP强度和Roland-Morris残疾问卷(RMDQ)的100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS) )用于特定于背部的功能分别用于评估主要和次要结局。实质性改善定义为与基线相比在第12周减少50%或更多。 RR和需要治疗的人数(NNT)的累积分布函数用于评估响应。结果:总体上观察到对LBP强度的中等治疗效果(RR,1.41; 95%CI,1.13-1.76; P = .002; NNT,6.9; 95%CI,4.3-18.6)。但是,在基线VAS评分为35 mm或更高的患者中观察到了巨大的治疗效果。尽管OMT与背部特异性功能的总体实质改善无关,但基线RMDQ评分为7或更高的患者会出现中等效果,而基线RMDQ评分为16或更高的患者会出现明显的重大效果。 OMT对LBP强度和背部特定功能的影响独立于基线患者的人口统计学特征,合并症,在试验期间使用LBP的药物。结论:根据基线水平的慢性LBP强度和特定于背部的功能进行分组似乎是一种简单的策略,用于识别大量通过OMT取得显着改善的患者,因此可能不太可能使用成本更高的侵入性干预措施。 (ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT00315120)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号