首页> 外文期刊>Johnson Matthey Technology Review >Final Analysis: Biological or Chemical Catalysis?
【24h】

Final Analysis: Biological or Chemical Catalysis?

机译:最终分析:生物还是化学催化?

获取原文
           

摘要

A common question asked by process chemists is “Do I use a biocatalyst or one based on a transition metal?”. The choice can be an important part of route scouting (1). Unlike many articles that leave the reader waiting to the end, here is the answer: “It depends”.The advantages of using a catalyst rather than a stoichiometric reagent can be summed up by the concepts of ‘green’ chemistry (2), but the simple way to look at the catalytic approach is that less of a catalyst is used compared to a stoichiometric reagent, so the cost of the material and its removal is reduced.In the past, processes were designed by chemists who had little familiarity with biotransformations and enzymes. Thus, the use of an enzyme was a means of last resort (3). Now, many companies have process groups which include members who are familiar with enzymes and biotransformations. Indeed, to those who are familiar with biological systems, they seem to be the solution to most problems!
机译:过程化学家提出的一个常见问题是“我使用生物催化剂还是基于过渡金属的生物催化剂?”。选择可能是路线搜寻(1)的重要组成部分。与许多文章需要读者等到最后的文章不同,答案是:“取决于情况”。使用催化剂而不是化学计量试剂的优势可以通过“绿色”化学概念来概括(2),但是观察催化方法的简单方法是,与化学计量试剂相比,使用的催化剂更少,因此降低了材料成本和去除方法的成本。过去,工艺是由对生物转化不太熟悉的化学家设计的和酶。因此,使用酶是不得已的手段(3)。现在,许多公司都有处理小组,其中包括熟悉酶和生物转化的成员。确实,对于那些熟悉生物系统的人来说,它们似乎是大多数问题的解决方案!

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号