首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Mental Health >Pregnant Women’s Perceptions of the Risks and Benefits of Disclosure During Web-Based Mental Health E-Screening Versus Paper-Based Screening: Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Pregnant Women’s Perceptions of the Risks and Benefits of Disclosure During Web-Based Mental Health E-Screening Versus Paper-Based Screening: Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:孕妇对基于网络的心理健康电子筛查与基于纸质筛查的披露风险和收益的感知:随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Pregnant women’s perceptions of the risks and benefits during mental health screening impact their willingness to disclose concerns. Early research in violence screening suggests that such perceptions may vary by mode of screening, whereby women view the anonymity of e-screening as less risky than other approaches. Understanding whether mode of screening influences perceptions of risk and benefit of disclosure is important in screening implementation. Objective The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the perceptions of pregnant women randomized to a Web-based screening intervention group and a paper-based screening control group on the level of risk and benefit they perceive in disclosing mental health concerns to their prenatal care provider. A secondary objective was to identify factors associated with women’s perceptions of risk and benefit of disclosure. Methods Pregnant women recruited from maternity clinics, hospitals, and prenatal classes were computer-randomized to a fully automated Web-based e-screening intervention group or a paper-based control. The intervention group completed the Antenatal Psychosocial Health Assessment and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale on a computer tablet, whereas the control group completed them on paper. The primary outcome was women’s perceptions of the risk and benefits of mental health screening using the Disclosure Expectations Scale (DES). A completer analysis was conducted. Statistical significance was set at P <.05. We used t tests to compare the means of the risk and benefit subscales between groups. Results Of the 675 eligible women approached, 636 (94.2%) agreed to participate and were randomized to the intervention (n=305) and control (n=331) groups. There were no significant baseline differences between groups. The mode of screening was not associated with either perceived risk or benefit of screening. There were no differences in groups in the mean scores of the risk and benefit of disclosure subscales. Over three-quarters of women in both intervention and control groups perceived that mental health screening was beneficial. However, 43.1% (272/631) of women in both groups reported feeling very, moderately, or somewhat vulnerable during mental health screening. We found that women of low income, those treated previously for depression or anxiety, and those pregnant with their first child were more likely to perceive greater risk. However, these associations were very small. Conclusions Pregnant women in both the e-screening and paper-based screening groups perceived benefit and risk of disclosure similarly, suggesting that providers can implement the mode of screening that is most ideal for their clinical setting. Regardless of the mode of screening, a substantial number of women reported feeling vulnerable during mental health screening, highlighting the importance of the need to reduce women’s vulnerability throughout the screening process with strategies such as addressing women’s concerns, explaining the rationale for screening, and discussing how results will be used. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01899534","term_id":"NCT01899534"}} NCT01899534 ; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01899534","term_id":"NCT01899534"}} NCT01899534 (Archived by WebCite at?http://www.webcitation.org/6tRKtGC4M).
机译:背景技术孕妇在心理健康筛查过程中对风险和收益的看法会影响她们表达疑虑的意愿。暴力筛查的早期研究表明,这种看法可能会因筛查方式而异,因此女性认为电子筛查的匿名性比其他方法风险低。在筛选实施过程中,了解筛选模式是否会影响对风险和披露利益的认识很重要。目的这项随机对照试验的目的是将随机分配的孕妇对基于网络的筛查干预组和基于纸质的筛查对照组的看法进行比较,以了解她们在向产前披露心理健康问题方面的风险和收益水平护理人员。第二个目标是确定与女性对信息披露的风险和收益的看法有关的因素。方法将从产科诊所,医院和产前班招募的孕妇计算机随机分配到基于Web的全自动电子筛查干预组或基于纸质的对照组。干预组在平板电脑上完成了《产前心理社会健康评估》和《爱丁堡产后抑郁量表》,而对照组则在纸上完成了评估。主要结果是妇女使用“披露期望量表”(DES)对心理健康筛查的风险和收益的认识。进行了更完整的分析。统计显着性设定为P <.05。我们使用t检验来比较各组之间风险和收益子量表的均值。结果在675名符合条件的妇女中,有636名(94.2%)同意参加,并随机分为干预组(n = 305)和对照组(n = 331)。两组之间没有明显的基线差异。筛查的方式与感知的筛查风险或筛查的益处均无关。披露子量表的风险和收益的平均评分在各组之间没有差异。在干预组和对照组中,超过四分之三的妇女认为心理健康筛查是有益的。但是,两组中有43.1%(272/631)的女性在心理健康筛查中报告感到非常,中度或有些脆弱。我们发现,低收入女性,先前因抑郁或焦虑而接受治疗的女性以及怀有第一个孩子的女性更有可能感受到更大的风险。但是,这些关联很小。结论在电子筛查和纸质筛查组中,孕妇对信息披露的益处和风险均相似,这表明提供者可以实施最适合其临床环境的筛查模式。无论筛查的方式如何,大量妇女报告说在心理健康筛查中感到脆弱,强调了在解决整个筛查过程中减少妇女脆弱性的必要性的重要性,这些战略包括解决妇女的关切,解释筛查的理由以及讨论问题。如何使用结果。试用注册Clinicaltrials.gov {“ type”:“ clinical-trial”,“ attrs”:{“ text”:“ NCT01899534”,“ term_id”:“ NCT01899534”}} NCT01899534; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ {“ type”:“ clinical-trial”,“ attrs”:{“ text”:“ NCT01899534”,“ term_id”:“ NCT01899534”}} NCT01899534(由WebCite存档在?http://www.webcitation.org/6tRKtGC4M)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号