首页> 外文期刊>JMIR mHealth and uHealth >Hearing Tests Based on Biologically Calibrated Mobile Devices: Comparison With Pure-Tone Audiometry
【24h】

Hearing Tests Based on Biologically Calibrated Mobile Devices: Comparison With Pure-Tone Audiometry

机译:基于生物校准的移动设备的听力测试:与纯音测听的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Hearing screening tests based on pure-tone audiometry may be conducted on mobile devices, provided that the devices are specially calibrated for the purpose. Calibration consists of determining the reference sound level and can be performed in relation to the hearing threshold of normal-hearing persons. In the case of devices provided by the manufacturer, together with bundled headphones, the reference sound level can be calculated once for all devices of the same model. Objective This study aimed to compare the hearing threshold measured by a mobile device that was calibrated using a model-specific, biologically determined reference sound level with the hearing threshold obtained in pure-tone audiometry. Methods Trial participants were recruited offline using face-to-face prompting from among Otolaryngology Clinic patients, who own Android-based mobile devices with bundled headphones. The hearing threshold was obtained on a mobile device by means of an open access app, Hearing Test, with incorporated model-specific reference sound levels. These reference sound levels were previously determined in uncontrolled conditions in relation to the hearing threshold of normal-hearing persons. An audiologist-assisted self-measurement was conducted by the participants in a sound booth, and it involved determining the lowest audible sound generated by the device within the frequency range of 250 Hz to 8 kHz. The results were compared with pure-tone audiometry. Results A total of 70 subjects, 34 men and 36 women, aged 18-71 years (mean 36, standard deviation [SD] 11) participated in the trial. The hearing threshold obtained on mobile devices was significantly different from the one determined by pure-tone audiometry with a mean difference of 2.6 dB (95% CI 2.0-3.1) and SD of 8.3 dB (95% CI 7.9-8.7). The number of differences not greater than 10 dB reached 89% (95% CI 88-91), whereas the mean absolute difference was obtained at 6.5 dB (95% CI 6.2-6.9). Sensitivity and specificity for a mobile-based screening method were calculated at 98% (95% CI 93-100.0) and 79% (95% CI 71-87), respectively. Conclusions The method of hearing self-test carried out on mobile devices with bundled headphones demonstrates high compatibility with pure-tone audiometry, which confirms its potential application in hearing monitoring, screening tests, or epidemiological examinations on a large scale.
机译:背景技术基于纯音测听的听力筛查测试可以在移动设备上进行,只要为此目的专门对设备进行了校准。校准包括确定参考声级,并且可以相对于正常听力者的听力阈值执行。对于制造商提供的设备以及捆绑的耳机,可以为同一型号的所有设备计算一次参考声级。目的这项研究旨在将使用特定于模型的,生物学确定的参考声级进行校准的移动设备所测得的听力阈值与纯音测听中获得的听力阈值进行比较。方法通过耳鼻喉科诊所患者的面对面提示,离线招募试验参与者,这些患者拥有带捆绑耳机的基于Android的移动设备。听力阈值是通过移动设备上的开放访问应用程序“听力测试”获得的,其中包含了特定于模型的参考声级。这些参考声级以前是在不受控制的条件下相对于正常听力者的听力阈值确定的。参与者在一个录音棚中进行了听觉医师协助的自我测量,其中涉及确定该设备在250 Hz至8 kHz频率范围内产生的最低听得见的声音。将结果与纯音测听法进行了比较。结果共有70名受试者(34名男性和36名女性)年龄在18-71岁之间(平均36岁,标准差[SD] 11)参加了该试验。在移动设备上获得的听力阈值与通过纯音测听法确定的阈值明显不同,其平均差为2.6 dB(95%CI 2.0-3.1)和SD为8.3 dB(95%CI 7.9-8.7)。不大于10 dB的差异数达到89%(95%CI 88-91),而平均绝对差异为6.5 dB(95%CI 6.2-6.9)。基于移动筛查方法的敏感性和特异性分别为98%(95%CI 93-100.0)和79%(95%CI 71-87)。结论在带有捆绑耳机的移动设备上进行的听力自测方法显示出与纯音测听法的高度兼容性,这证实了其在大规模的听力监测,筛查测试或流行病学检查中的潜在应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号