首页> 外文期刊>Drugs - Real World Outcomes >Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System
【24h】

Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System

机译:使用静脉镇静剂报告的严重心血管不良事件:MedWatch不良事件报告系统的回顾性分析

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundSerious cardiovascular adverse events (SCAEs) associated with intravenous sedatives remain poorly characterized. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare SCAE incidence, types, and mortality between intravenous benzodiazepines (i.e., diazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam), dexmedetomidine, and propofol in the USA over 8?years regardless of the clinical setting where it was administered. MethodsThe Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System was searched between 2004 and 2011 using the Evidexsup?/sup platform from Advera Health Analytics, Inc. to identify all reports that included one or more of ten different SCAEs (package insert incidence?≥?1%) and where an intravenous benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine, or propofol was the primary suspected drug. ResultsAmong the 2326 Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System cases reported, 394 (16.9%) were related to a SCAE. The presence of a SCAE (vs. a non-SCAE) is associated with higher mortality (34 vs. 8%, p ?0.001). The percentage of cases with one or more SCAE, the case mortality rate (%), and the incidence of each SCAE (per 10sup6/sup days of sedative exposure), respectively, were benzodiazepines (14, 26, 13) [diazepam (13, 23, 31); lorazepam (15, 43, 14); midazolam (14, 20, 11)]; dexmedetomidine (40, 15, 13); and propofol (17, 39, 7). Propofol (vs. either a benzodiazepine or dexmedetomidine) was associated with more total SCAEs (268 vs. 126, p ?0.001) but a lower incidence (per 10sup6/sup days of sedative exposure) of SCAE (7 vs. 13, p =?0.0001) and cardiac arrest [6.3 (benzodiazepine) vs. 6.7 (dexmedetomidine) vs. 1.4 (propofol), p ?0.0001]. ConclusionsSerious cardiac adverse events account for nearly one-fifth of intravenous sedative Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System reports. These SCAEs appear to be associated with greater mortality than non-cardiac serious adverse events. Serious cardiac events may be more prevalent with either benzodiazepines or dexmedetomidine than propofol.
机译:背景:与静脉内镇静剂相关的严重心血管不良事件(SCAE)的特征仍然不明确。目的这项研究的目的是比较美国在8年以上的时间里,无论静脉给药的苯二氮卓类药物(地西epa,劳拉西m和咪达唑仑),右美托咪定和丙泊酚之间的SCAE发生率,类型和死亡率如何,均与临床使用环境无关。方法使用Advera Health Analytics,Inc.的Evidex ?平台在2004年至2011年间搜索了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的MedWatch不良事件报告系统,以识别出包括十种不同SCAE中的一种或多种(包装)的所有报告插入发生率≥1%),而静脉注射苯二氮卓,右美托咪定或丙泊酚是主要可疑药物。结果在2326年美国食品药品管理局(FDA)的MedWatch不良事件报告系统病例中,有394例(16.9%)与SCAE有关。 SCAE(相对于非SCAE)的存在与更高的死亡率相关(34 vs. 8%,p <?0.001)。苯二氮卓类药物分别具有一种或多种SCAE的百分比,病例死亡率(%)和每种SCAE的发生率(每10 6 镇静剂暴露)(14、26, 13)[地西p(13,23,31);劳拉西m(15,43,14);咪达唑仑(14,20,11)];右美托咪定(40,15,13);和异丙酚(17,39,7)。丙泊酚(相对于苯二氮卓或右美托咪定)与更多的SCAE(268 vs. 126,p <?0.001)相关,但其SCAE发生率较低(每10sups 6sups镇静暴露)。 7 vs. 13,p = 0.0001)和心脏骤停[6.3(苯二氮卓)vs. 6.7(右美托咪定)vs. 1.4(丙泊酚),p <0.0001]。结论严重的心脏不良事件占静脉镇静剂的近五分之一,这是美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的MedWatch不良事件报告系统报告所得出的。与非心脏严重不良事件相比,这些SCAE似乎具有更高的死亡率。苯二氮卓类药物或右美托咪定比丙泊酚更易引起严重的心脏事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号