...
首页> 外文期刊>Diseases >Factors Associated with Post-Progression Survival in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib
【24h】

Factors Associated with Post-Progression Survival in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib

机译:索拉非尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌患者进展后生存的相关因素

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sorafenib exerts modest antitumor activity in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and radiological progressive disease (rPD) does not always correspond to so-called clinical progressive disease (cPD). We evaluated 101 patients who initiated sorafenib treatment for HCC and assessed post-progression survival (PPS) using the Cox proportional hazards model. PPS was calculated from the date of the first rPD until the date of death or the last follow-up. Using Cox model analysis of the 76 patients who experienced first rPD, we identified the Child-Pugh class, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, the best antitumor response during treatment (using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1) and α-fetoprotein levels as independent factors affecting PPS. When these factors were used to define scores ranging from zero to five with a cutoff value of two, PPS of patients who received best supportive care (BSC) after rPD was not statistically significantly different from that of patients who received post-rPD therapy with scores ≥2 (p = 0.220). In contrast, the PPS for the post-rPD therapy group was significantly longer compared with the BSC patients with scores 2 (p 0.001). Patients who scored ≥2 at their first rPD were judged cPD and as candidates for BSC.
机译:索拉非尼在晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中发挥适度的抗肿瘤活性,并且放射性进行性疾病(rPD)并不总是对应于所谓的临床进行性疾病(cPD)。我们评估了101名开始接受索拉非尼治疗HCC的患者,并使用Cox比例风险模型评估了进展后生存期(PPS)。从第一次rPD的日期到死亡或最后一次随访的日期计算PPS。使用Cox模型分析对76例首次进行rPD的患者进行分析,我们确定了Child-Pugh类,东部合作肿瘤小组的表现状态,治疗期间最佳抗肿瘤反应(使用实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)1.1版)和α -胎儿蛋白水平是影响PPS的独立因素。当使用这些因素来定义从0到5的分数(临界值为2)时,rPD后接受最佳支持治疗(BSC)的患者的PPS与接受rPD治疗后的分数的患者的统计学差异无统计学意义≥2(p = 0.220)。相比之下,rPD后治疗组的PPS与BSC得分<2(p <0.001)的患者相比明显更长。初次rPD得分≥2的患者被判定为cPD,并被认为是BSC的候选人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号