...
首页> 外文期刊>Diseases of Aquatic Organisms >Comparison of two fluorescent antibody techniques (FATs) for detection and quantification of Renibacterium salmoninarum in coelomic fluid of spawning chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
【24h】

Comparison of two fluorescent antibody techniques (FATs) for detection and quantification of Renibacterium salmoninarum in coelomic fluid of spawning chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha

机译:两种荧光抗体技术(FAT)的检测和定量产卵的奇努克鲑鱼Oncorhynchus tshawytscha结肠液中沙门氏菌的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two versions of the fluorescent antibody technique (FAT) were compared for detection and quantification of Renibacterium salmoninarum in coelomic fluid samples from naturally infected spawning chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. For the membrane filtration-FAT (MF-FAT), trypsin-treated samples were passed through 0.2 μm polycarbonate filters to concentrate bacteria for direct enumeration by immunofluorescence microscopy. For the smear-FAT (S-FAT), samples were centrifuged at 8800 × g for 10 min and the pelleted material was smeared on slides for immunofluorescence staining. Detected prevalences of Renibacterium salmoninarum were 1.8 to 3.4 times higher by the MF-FAT than by the S-FAT; differences were significant at p <= 0.0002. The S-FAT consistently detected R. salmoninarum only in samples with calculated bacterial concentrations >= 2.4 × 103 cells ml-1 by MF-FAT testing. Increasing the area examined on a filter or slide from 50 to 100 microscope fields at 1000× magnification resulted in the detection of a maximum of 4% additional positive samples by the MF-FAT and 7% additional positive samples by the S-FAT. In individual samples for which bacterial counts were obtained by both the MF-FAT and the S-FAT, the counts averaged from 47 times (±30 SD) to 175 times (±165 SD) higher by the MF-FAT.Centrifugation of samples at 10000 × g for 10 min resulted in a 4-fold increase in mean bacterial counts by the S-FAT compared with a 10-min centrifugation at 2000 × g, but the highest calculated bacterial concentration obtained by S-FAT testing was more than 6-fold lower than that obtained for the same sample by MF-FAT testing. Because of its greater sensitivity, the MF-FAT is preferable to the S-FAT for use in critical situations requiring the detection of low numbers of R. salmoninarum.
机译:比较了两种版本的荧光抗体技术(FAT)在自然感染的奇努克鲑鱼 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 的产卵液样品中检测和定量沙门氏菌的检测。对于膜过滤-FAT(MF-FAT),将经过胰蛋白酶处理的样品通过0.2μm聚碳酸酯过滤器,以浓缩细菌,以便通过免疫荧光显微镜直接计数。对于涂片FAT(S-FAT),将样品以8800×g离心10分钟,然后将沉淀的材料涂在载玻片上进行免疫荧光染色。 MF-FAT检出的沙门氏菌>的发生率是S-FAT的1.8至3.4倍; p <= 0.0002时差异显着。 S-FAT始终检测到 R。沙门氏菌仅在通过MF-FAT测试计算出的细菌浓度> = 2.4×10 3 细胞ml -1 的样品中。将滤镜或载玻片上的检查区域从50倍显微镜放大到100倍,导致MF-FAT最多检测4%的阳性样品,S-FAT最多检测7%的阳性样品。在通过MF-FAT和S-FAT同时获得细菌计数的单个样品中,MF-FAT的平均计数从47倍(±30 SD)到175倍(±165 SD)高。在10000× g 下10分钟离心后,与2000× g 10分钟离心相比,S-FAT的平均细菌计数增加了4倍,但是通过S-FAT测试获得的最高计算细菌浓度比通过MF-FAT测试获得的相同样品低6倍以上。由于其较高的灵敏度,因此在需要检测少量R的关键情况下,MF-FAT优于S-FAT。鲑鱼

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号