首页> 外文期刊>Disease models & mechanisms: DMM >Seeking out the sweet spot in cancer therapeutics: an interview with Lewis Cantley
【24h】

Seeking out the sweet spot in cancer therapeutics: an interview with Lewis Cantley

机译:寻找癌症治疗的最佳方法:刘易斯·坎特利(Lewis Cantley)访谈

获取原文
       

摘要

Lewis C. Cantley, Director of the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine, is a world leader in cancer and metabolic disease research. His seminal discoveries have shed light on the regulation of ion pumps and other transport proteins, insulin-mediated regulation of glucose metabolism and the role of signal transduction networks in cell transformation. At Tufts University in the 1980s, Lewis and his collaborators unveiled and characterized the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway; a discovery that revolutionized the field of lipid signaling. In this interview, he documents his journey from serendipitous discovery of the pathway to determining its diverse physiological functions and role in cancer – an incredible odyssey that has laid the groundwork for clinical trials based on PI3K inhibitors. He also discusses the impact his early life had in spurring a thirst to understand biological processes at the molecular level, highlights how his multiple collaborations have helped in translating his basic discoveries to the clinic and explains why eating a high-sugar diet can be harmful. Ongoing studies in the Cantley lab are aimed at determining the mechanistic underpinnings of pancreatic, colorectal, ovarian and breast cancers, particularly the role of cellular metabolic pathways. The group has recently shown, amongst other breakthroughs, that vitamin C could provide a promising therapy for certain hard-to-treat cancers. I once read that, as a child, you worked out how to build fireworks. Did you always know that you would end up as a scientist?Firecrackers were illegal where I grew up in West Virginia. When I was around 10-11?years old, I wanted to buy some, so my dad said “why don't you make your own?” He wasn't a chemist, but he was a very smart man and he figured out from reading the encyclopedia that we needed just three ingredients. I went to the drug store, bought the ingredients and made my own gunpowder. It wasn't very effective in blowing up, but it burned very well. I started using my homemade gunpowder as a fuel to try to launch rockets – and it worked, although I didn't get them very high. Today I would probably be arrested based on the buying pattern I had at the local drug store!I did know I wanted to be a scientist from very early on. I was largely influenced by my father who, whenever I asked a question about how things work, would always come up with a logical explanation rather than resort to saying “because God made it that way”. If he didn't know the answer, he would refer to the encyclopedia. By the time I started school I realized that I actually knew a lot more science than most of my teachers. I had a talent for it, particularly chemistry. One of my presents growing up was a chemistry set, and I loved mixing things together and seeing colors change and causing occasional explosions. I just found that amazingly fun.When did you start using your talent for chemistry to answer biological questions?I was always interested in biology, too. I grew up on a farm and loved growing tomato plants, which made me wonder how photosynthesis works. I found it a magical thing – that the sun shines on a plant and it takes off growing. I thought if we could figure out how this works, light energy could be captured to do all kinds of things. But I found high school biology very boring – we memorized a whole lot of things without getting any real mechanistic insight into the processes. I swore at that time that I would never take another course in biology. I decided it would be much better to learn chemistry and, ultimately, I suspected that there would be nothing in biology that couldn't be explained by chemistry. I liked to understand kinetics and how reactions happen, so I decided to go into biophysical chemistry. In the end, that was the right path to take, although had you told me when I was 25 years old that I would be the director of a cancer center I would have been incredulous, given that I was totally into chemistry. “…had you told me when I was 25 years old that I would be the director of a cancer center I would have been incredulous, given that I was totally into chemistry” What were the major aims and findings of your PhD in Gordon Hammes's lab at Cornell University?I originally worked on the F1 portion of the ATP synthase in chloroplasts and mitochondria. At that time, the chemiosmotic hypothesis – proposed by Peter Mitchell in the early 60s – was very controversial. People were beginning to believe it but there were still a lot of holdouts; major luminaries in the field who just would not accept the concept that you could use an electrochemical gradient to synthesize a molecule. Although Mitchell's hypothesis was controversial, I found it really compelling when I was an undergraduate. That's why it was exciting for me to work on the enzyme that meditates the chemiosmotic effect as a graduate student.There seems to have been resurgence of interes
机译:Weill Cornell Medicine的Sandra和Edward Meyer癌症中心主任Lewis C. Cantley是癌症和代谢性疾病研究的全球领导者。他的开创性发现揭示了离子泵和其他转运蛋白的调节,胰岛素介导的葡萄糖代谢调节以及信号转导网络在细胞转化中的作用。 1980年代,塔夫斯大学(Tufts University)的Lewis及其合作者揭示并表征了磷酸肌醇3激酶(PI3K)信号传导途径。这一发现彻底改变了脂质信号传导领域。在这次采访中,他记录了从偶然发现该途径到确定其多种生理功能和在癌症中的作用的过程-一项令人难以置信的冒险之旅,为基于PI3K抑制剂的临床试验奠定了基础。他还讨论了他的早期生活对激发渴望从分子水平理解生物学过程的影响,强调了他的多次合作如何帮助将其基础发现转化为临床,并解释了为什么食用高糖饮食可能有害。 Cantley实验室正在进行的研究旨在确定胰腺癌,结肠直肠癌,卵巢癌和乳腺癌的机制,特别是细胞代谢途径的作用。该小组最近显示,除其他突破外,维生素C可以为某些难以治疗的癌症提供有希望的疗法。我曾经读过,小时候,您就学会了如何制作烟花。您一直都知道自己会成为科学家吗?在西弗吉尼亚长大的地方,鞭炮是非法的。当我大约10-11岁时,我想买一些,所以我父亲说:“为什么不自己做?”他不是化学家,但他是一个非常聪明的人,他从阅读百科全书中得知我们只需要三种成分。我去了药店,买了药材,然后自制了火药。炸毁效果不佳,但燃烧得很好。我开始用自制的火药作为燃料来发射火箭,尽管我并没有使它们过高,但它还是起作用了。今天我可能会因为在当地药店的购买方式而被捕!我确实很早就想成为一名科学家。父亲给我的影响很大,每当我问到事情如何运作的问题时,我总会提出合理的解释,而不是诉诸“因为上帝是那样做的”。如果他不知道答案,他会参考百科全书。当我开始上学的时候,我意识到我实际上比大多数老师了解更多的科学知识。我对此很有才能,尤其是化学。我长大的礼物之一是化学装置,我喜欢将事物混合在一起,看到颜色变化并偶尔引起爆炸。我刚刚发现这非常有趣。您什么时候开始使用化学才能回答生物学问题的?我也一直对生物学感兴趣。我在一个农场长大,喜欢种植西红柿,这使我想知道光合作用是如何工作的。我发现这是一件神奇的事情–阳光照在植物上,它开始生长。我以为如果能弄清楚它是如何工作的,就可以捕获光能来做各种事情。但是我发现高中生物学很无聊–我们记住了很多东西,但没有真正的机械洞察力。那时我发誓永远不会再学生物学。我认为学习化学会好得多,最终,我怀疑生物学中没有任何东西无法用化学来解释。我喜欢了解动力学以及反应如何发生,因此我决定进入生物物理化学领域。最后,这是一条正确的道路,尽管您告诉我25岁的时候我将担任癌症中心的主任,但由于我完全投身于化学领域,我本来会非常怀疑。 “……当我25岁时,您曾告诉我,我将担任癌症中心的主任,如果我全心投入化学工作,那我将是个不可思议的问题。”戈登·哈姆斯(Gordon Hammes)实验室的博士学位的主要目标和发现是什么?我最初在康奈尔大学工作,研究叶绿体和线粒体中ATP合酶的F 1 部分。当时,由彼得·米切尔(Peter Mitchell)在60年代初提出的化学渗透假说非常有争议。人们开始相信它,但仍然存在许多障碍。该领域的主要照明专家只是不接受您可以使用电化学梯度来合成分子的概念。尽管米切尔的假设颇具争议,但我在大学时发现它确实令人信服。这就是为什么我对研究研究生化学沉着作用的酶的研究感到兴奋的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号