...
首页> 外文期刊>The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine >Laryngeal Nerves Monitoring Versus Non-monitoring in Thyroid Surgery
【24h】

Laryngeal Nerves Monitoring Versus Non-monitoring in Thyroid Surgery

机译:甲状腺手术中的喉神经监测与非监测

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and objectives: Thyroid surgery is the most common cause of recurrent nerve (RLN) injury. Deliberate identification of the RLN minimizes the risk of injury. When the nerve is identified and dissected, the reported RLN injury rate during thyroidectomy is 0-2.1%. Continuous intra-operative nerve monitoring during surgery remains a controversial issue. The basic technique involves a skin surface electrode or muscle electrode used to make electromyography (EMG) recordings, which have an audible alarm to alert the surgeon if passive (e.g.stretch during traction) or active nerve stimulation has occurred. We aim to evaluate the use of intra-operative nerve monitoring (IONM) to preserve the laryngeal nerves that may be at risk for injury during thyroid surgery and show the merits of using electrophysiologic laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid surgery. Patients and methods: This study was conducted as a prospective study on 28 patients whom are thyroidectomy candidates; we elected 14 thyroidectomy candidates in whom we don't use NIM during surgery (Control group_A). These patients were chosen to be evenly matched with another 14 thyroidectomy candidates to monitor the recurrent laryngeal (RLN) and external branch of superior laryngeal (EBSLN) throughout thyroidectomy procedures (NIM group_ B) to compare the laryngeal nerves risk of injury with and without the use of nerve monitor. Results: Four patients (2 patients in-group A and 2 patients in-group B) were dysphonic after operation. Laryngoscopy revealed unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in all except one bilateral in group A. There were no significant differences in RLN paralysis, paresis, or total injury rates between both groups. The number of patients in the presented study was limited to draw a statistical conclusion for significance. Conclusions: The routine application of IONM cannot prevent or reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. However the study signifies the trend towards the use of INOM in expectedly difficult cases and in revision surgery with distorted anatomical relationships and fibrous adhesions
机译:背景与目的:甲状腺手术是造成复发神经(RLN)损伤的最常见原因。刻意识别RLN可以最大程度地降低受伤风险。识别并解剖神经后,甲状腺切除术中报告的RLN损伤率为0-2.1%。手术期间持续进行术中神经监测仍然是一个有争议的问题。基本技术涉及用于进行肌电图(EMG)记录的皮肤表面电极或肌肉电极,如果发生被动(例如牵引过程中的伸展)或主动神经刺激,则会发出声音警报以警告外科医生。我们的目的是评估术中神经监测(IONM)的使用,以保护可能在甲状腺手术中受伤的喉神经,并展示在甲状腺手术中使用电生理性喉神经监测的优点。患者和方法:本研究是对28例甲状腺切除术候选患者进行的前瞻性研究。我们选出了14名在手术期间不使用NIM的甲状腺切除术候选人(对照组A)。选择这些患者与另外14例甲状腺切除术患者平均匹配,以监测整个甲状腺切除术过程中喉返神经(RLN)和上喉外部分支(EBSLN)(NIM组B)的比较,以比较有无喉返神经的喉神经受伤风险。使用神经监护仪。结果:4例患者(A组2例,B组2例)术后出现发音困难。喉镜检查显示,除A组中的一只双侧外,其他所有患者均患有单侧喉返神经麻痹。两组之间,RLN麻痹,麻痹或总损伤率无显着差异。本研究中的患者数量有限,不能得出有意义的统计结论。结论:IONM的常规应用不能预防或减轻喉返神经的复发。然而,这项研究表明,在预期困难的病例和翻修手术中,由于解剖学关系和纤维粘连变形,使用INOM的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号