...
首页> 外文期刊>The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine >The Utility of P53, P63, P57 and Ki67 Immunohistochemistry in the Differentiation between Hydropic Abortion and Molar Pregnancy (Immunohistochemical Study)
【24h】

The Utility of P53, P63, P57 and Ki67 Immunohistochemistry in the Differentiation between Hydropic Abortion and Molar Pregnancy (Immunohistochemical Study)

机译:P53,P63,P57和Ki67免疫组织化学在区分流产与磨牙妊娠中的作用(免疫组织化学研究)

获取原文

摘要

Background: The classification of molar pregnancies into a complete and a partial hydatidiform mole and the differentiation from hydropic abortions are usually accomplished by histomorphologic features alone, but sometimes may be inaccurate or inconclusive. Immunohistochemical staining techniques have been reported as a good diagnostic method complementary to the histologic diagnosis. One of the advantages of this technique is the ability to apply it retrospectively to sections of formalin fixed/paraffin embedded tissue and therefore, there is no need for expensive or sophisticated techniques. Aim of the Work: This study aimed to determine if immunohistochemical expression of p53, p63, p57 and Ki67 could aid in differentiating molar from non molar pregnancies on one hand and complete mole from partial mole on the other hand. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 placental specimens were enrolled in this study including 60 non molar placental specimens with hydropic changes (HA) and 120 molar specimens (60 complete hydatidiform moles (CHMs) and 60 partial hydatidiform moles (PHMs). The studied cases were examined histologically and immunohistochemically for expression of p53, p63, p57 and Ki67. Results: There was a significant difference in p57 expression between HA and PHM (P value 0.05), HA and CHM (P value 0.0001) and also between PHM and CHM (P value 0.003). There was a significant difference in Ki67 expression between HA and PHM (P value 0.03), PHM and CHM (P value 0.01) and between HA and CHM (P value 0.009). There was no significant difference in P63 expression between HA and PHM (P value 0.8), PHM and CHM (P value 0.5), and also between HA and CHM (P value 0.2). A significant difference in p53 expression between HA and CHM (P value 0.007) was noted, also between PHM and CHM (P value 0.005), while no significant difference between HA and PHM in expression of p53 (P value 0.8).
机译:背景:将磨牙妊娠分为完全的和部分的葡萄胎和从流产性流产的区分通常仅通过组织形态学特征来完成,但有时可能不准确或无定论。免疫组织化学染色技术已被报道为对组织学诊断的一种很好的诊断方法。该技术的优点之一是能够将其追溯应用于福尔马林固定/石蜡包埋的组织切片,因此不需要昂贵或复杂的技术。工作目的:这项研究旨在确定p53,p63,p57和Ki67的免疫组织化学表达是否可以一方面帮助区分臼齿与非臼齿怀孕,另一方面可以帮助区分完全痣和部分痣。材料和方法:共纳入180个胎盘标本,包括60个具有水样变化(HA)的非磨牙胎盘标本和120个磨牙标本(60个完整的葡萄胎和60个部分葡萄胎)。结果:HA和PHM之间(P值<0.05),HA和CHM(P值<0.0001)以及两者之间的p57,p63,p57和Ki67的表达进行了组织学和免疫组织化学检查。 PHM和CHM(P值<0.003)。HA和PHM(P值<0.03),PHM和CHM(P值<0.01)以及HA和CHM(P值<0.009)之间Ki67表达存在显着差异。 HA和PHM之间(P值0.8),PHM和CHM(P值0.5),以及HA和CHM之间(P值0.2)之间的P63表达没有显着差异。在PHM和CHM之间也注意到P值<0.007)(P值<0 .005),而HA和PHM在p53的表达上无显着差异(P值0.8)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号