首页> 外文期刊>Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology >Participatory Research and Empowerment: A Conceptual Revisit of the Debate on Alternative Social Science Research
【24h】

Participatory Research and Empowerment: A Conceptual Revisit of the Debate on Alternative Social Science Research

机译:参与式研究与赋权:关于替代性社会科学研究的辩论的概念性回顾

获取原文
       

摘要

After the 1970s, there has been a growing emphasis on participatory research aimed at capturing people’s lived realities of everyday lives. The proponents of participatory research (also called alternative research) build on a critique of what is called “extractive,” top-down, and so-called objective empirical research of positivist kind. In contrast, alternative research method embeds research with empowerment and regards survey based conventional research as instrumental. This paper first introduces basic premises of alternative research method together with its philosophical underpinning. Drawing arguments from Robert Chambers the following section compares and contrasts the conventional and alternative research methods. Further, a paradigm shift in social science research in terms of reversals of frame, reversals of modes, reversal of relation and reversal of power is dealt. The final section draws a conclusion that compared to survey based, “objective,” conventional research method, participatory researches are superior in facilitating knowledge generation process, eventually empowering the people.
机译:1970年代后,参与式研究越来越受到重视,旨在捕捉人们日常生活的现实。参与式研究(也称为替代研究)的拥护者基于对所谓的“抽取性”,自上而下和所谓的实证主义客观经验研究的批判。相反,替代性研究方法将研究与赋能相结合,并且将基于调查的常规研究视为工具性研究。本文首先介绍了替代研究方法的基本前提及其哲学基础。以下部分从罗伯特·钱伯斯(Robert Chambers)得出论点,以比较和对比传统研究方法和替代研究方法。此外,从框架的颠倒,模式的颠倒,关系的颠倒和权力的颠倒,进行了社会科学研究的范式转变。最后一部分得出的结论是,与基于调查的“客观”传统研究方法相比,参与式研究在促进知识生成过程,最终赋予人民权力方面具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号