...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome >Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
【24h】

Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?

机译:糖尿病管理指南是否适用于“现实生活”?

获取原文

摘要

Background The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has published several diabetes treatment algorithms, but none have been tested in real-life settings. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility of achieving and/or maintaining HbA1c levels <7.0% using current diabetes treatment guidelines and the resources available in the public health care system of Brazil. Methods A one-year, single-arm interventional study was conducted with type 2 diabetes patients in a primary care unit. Intervention consisted of intensification of lifestyle changes and sequential prescription of drugs based on ADA guidelines using the medications available through the publicly funded Unified Health System (Sistema único de Saúde, SUS). Results Ninety patients (age: 62.7±10.4 years; diabetes duration: 8.2±9.1 years) completed the trial. During the intervention period, increases were observed in number of oral antidiabetic agent (OAD) classes per patient (1.50±0.74 vs. 1.67±0.7; p=0.015), OAD pills per patient (2.64±1.89 vs. 3.33±2.23 pills/patient; p <0.001), insulin dosage (0.20±0.29 vs.0.50±0.36 UI/kg/day; p=0.008) and number of patients on insulin (19 [21%] vs. 31 [34%]; p<0.01), but no improvement in HbA1c (7.2±1.6% vs. 7.3±1.5%; p=0.453) or frequency of patients on target, defined as HbA1c <7% (53.3% vs. 48.9%; p=0.655). Patients with baseline HbA1c <7% had a small increase in HbA1c during the trial (6.3±0.4 vs. 6.7±0.9%; p=0.002). No such change was observed in those with baseline HbA1c ≥7%. Conclusions In this group of patients with a mean baseline HbA1c of 7.2%, implementation of 2006/2009 ADA/EASD guidelines led to achievement of the therapeutic goal of HbA1c <7% in a small proportion of patients.
机译:背景技术美国糖尿病协会(ADA)已发布了几种糖尿病治疗算法,但没有在实际环境中进行过测试。这项研究的目的是使用当前的糖尿病治疗指南和巴西公共卫生保健系统中可用的资源,分析实现和/或维持HbA1c水平<7.0%的可行性。方法在基层医疗单位对2型糖尿病患者进行为期一年的单臂干预研究。干预措施包括加强生活方式的改变和根据ADA指南使用通过公共资助的统一卫生系统(SistemaúnicodeSaúde,SUS)提供的药物的顺序用药。结果90名患者(年龄:62.7±10.4岁;糖尿病病程:8.2±9.1岁)完成了该试验。在干预期间,观察到每位患者的口服抗糖尿病药(OAD)种类增加(1.50±0.74 vs. 1.67±0.7; p = 0.015),每位患者的OAD药片数量(2.64±1.89 vs. 3.33±2.23丸/患者; p <0.001),胰岛素剂量(0.20±0.29 vs.0.50±0.36 UI / kg /天; p = 0.008)和接受胰岛素治疗的患者人数(19 [21%] vs. 31 [34%]; p < 0.01),但HbA1c(7.2±1.6%vs. 7.3±1.5%; p = 0.453)或目标患者的频率没有改善,定义为HbA1c <7%(53.3%vs.48.9%; p = 0.655)。基线HbA1c <7%的患者在试验期间HbA1c的升高很小(6.3±0.4对6.7±0.9%; p = 0.002)。在基线HbA1c≥7%的人群中未观察到此类变化。结论在这组平均基线HbA1c为7.2%的患者中,实施2006/2009 ADA / EASD指南导致一小部分患者实现了HbA1c <7%的治疗目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号