首页> 外文期刊>Dermatology Online Journal >Evaluating Dermatology Residency Program Websites
【24h】

Evaluating Dermatology Residency Program Websites

机译:评估皮肤科住院医师计划网站

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Internet resources play an important role in how medical students access information?related to residency programs.Evaluating program websites is necessary in order to provide accurate information for applicants?and provide information regarding areas of website improvement for programs. To date, dermatology?residency websites (D ?WS) have not been evaluated.This paper evaluates dermatology residency websites based on availability of predefined measures.Methods: Using the FREIDA (Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database) Online?database, authors searched forall accredited dermatology program websites. Eligible programs were identified through the FREIDA?Online database and had a functioning website. Two authors independently extracted data with?consensus or third researcher resolution of differences. This data was accessed and archived from?July 15th to July 17th, 2015.Primary outcomes measured were presence of content on education, resident and faculty information,?program environment, applicant recruitment, schedule, salary, and website quality evaluated using?an online tool (WooRank.com).Results: Out of 117 accredited dermatology residencies, 115 had functioning webpages. Of these,?76.5% (75) had direct links found on the FRIEDA Online database. Most programs contained?information on education, faculty, program environment, and applicant recruitment. However, website?quality and marketing effectiveness were highly variable; most programs were deemed to need?improvements in the functioning of their webpages. Also, additional information on current?residents and about potential away rotations were lacking from most websites with only 52.2% (60)?and 41.7% (48) of programs providing this content, respectively.Conclusions: A majority of dermatology residency websites contained adequate information on many of?the factors we evaluated. However, many were lacking in areas that matter to applicants. We hope?this report will encourage dermatology residencyprograms to improve their websites and provide adequate content to attract the top residents for?their respective programs.
机译:背景:Internet资源在医学生如何访问与居留计划相关的信息中起着重要作用。有必要评估计划网站,以便为申请人提供准确的信息,并提供有关计划网站改进领域的信息。迄今为止,尚未对皮肤科住院医师网站(D?WS)进行评估。本文根据预定义措施的可用性评估皮肤科住院医师网站。认可的皮肤病学计划网站。通过FREIDA在线数据库确定了合格的程序,并拥有一个正常运行的网站。两位作者独立地提取了具有共识或第三位研究者差异的数据。该数据于2015年7月15日至7月17日访问和存档。测量的主要结果是教育内容,居民和教职人员信息,计划环境,申请人招聘,日程安排,薪水以及使用在线网站评估的网站质量结果(WooRank.com)。结果:在117个获得认可的皮肤病学专家中,有115个具有正常工作的网页。其中,有76.5%(75)的直接链接位于FRIEDA在线数据库中。大多数课程包含有关教育,师资,课程环境和应聘者的信息。但是,网站的质量和营销效果变化很大。大多数程序被认为需要改进其网页的功能。此外,大多数网站都缺少有关当前居民以及潜在的轮换的其他信息,分别只有52.2%(60)和41.7%(48)的程序提供了此内容。结论:大多数皮肤病学驻留网站包含足够的内容有关我们评估的许多因素的信息。但是,许多领域都缺乏申请人重要的领域。我们希望这份报告将鼓励皮肤科住院医师计划改善其网站,并提供足够的内容以吸引顶级居民参加其各自的计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号