首页> 外文期刊>Dermatology and Therapy >Efficacy and Safety of Three Cryotherapy Devices for Wart Treatment: A Randomized, Controlled, Investigator-Blinded, Comparative Study
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Three Cryotherapy Devices for Wart Treatment: A Randomized, Controlled, Investigator-Blinded, Comparative Study

机译:三种冷冻疗法治疗疣的功效和安全性:一项随机,对照,研究者盲的对比研究

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionCutaneous warts are common skin lesions, caused by human papillomavirus. For years, liquid nitrogen is the cryogen of choice for wart treatment. Alternatively, several cryogenic devices for home treatment are commercially available. The present trial assessed efficacy and safety of a novel nitrous oxide-based cryogenic device for home use (EndWarts Freeze? in Europe, Compound W? Nitro-Freeze in the USA). MethodsThis investigator-blinded, controlled, randomized study compared the nitrous oxide device (test product) with a dimethylether propane-based product (Wartner?; comparator 1). Subjects with common or plantar warts (50/50 ratio) were randomized into two groups ( n =?58, test product; n =?40, comparator 1). Sequentially, an extra treatment arm ( n =?40) was added to compare with a dimethylether-based product with metal nib (Wortie?; comparator 2). Main objective implied comparison of the percentage cured subjects after one to maximum three treatments. Efficacy and safety was evaluated by a blinded investigator. ResultsAfter a maximum of three applications, a significantly ( p =?0.001) higher cure rate of 70.7% (Intention-to-Treat analysis) was observed with test product versus 46.2% (comparator 1) and 47.5% (comparator 2). Almost three times more subjects were cured after 1 test product application (29.3%), versus comparator 1 (10.4%) and comparator 2 (12.5%). Reported side effects were transient and typical of cryotherapy. All treatments were well-tolerated. ConclusionThe superior cure rates for the test product versus two comparators can be explained by its design. Combination of nitrous oxide (cooling agent), the specific activation method (holding the liquid coolant in the cap), and skin-conforming polyurethane foam, results in higher cooling efficiency (??80?°C) and more effective wart freezing. This trial demonstrated that the nitrous oxide device is a safe, user-friendly and effective wart treatment for home use, comparing favourably to dimethylether (propane) devices with higher freezing temperature, regardless of the applicator type. FundingOystershell Laboratories. Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT03129373.
机译:引言疣是人类乳头瘤病毒引起的常见皮肤病变。多年来,液氮是疣治疗的首选冷冻剂。可替代地,几种用于家庭治疗的低温设备是可商购的。本试验评估了新型基于一氧化二氮的家用低温装置的有效性和安全性(欧洲的EndWarts Freeze ?,美国的化合物W ? Nitro-Freeze)。 。方法:该研究人员进行了一项盲法,对照,随机对照研究,比较了一氧化二氮装置(测试产品)和二甲醚丙烷基产品(Wartner ?;比较例1)。将患有普通或足底疣(50/50的比率)的受试者随机分为两组(n =?58,测试产品; n =?40,比较器1)。顺序地,添加一个额外的处理臂(n = 40),以与具有金属笔尖的二甲醚基产品进行比较(Wortie ?;比较器2)。主要目的是比较一到最多三种治疗后治愈的受试者的百分比。盲人调查员评估了疗效和安全性。结果最多进行三次施用后,测试产品的治愈率显着提高(p =?0.001)(意向治疗分析),分别为46.2%(比较器1)和47.5%(比较器2)。施用一种测试产品后,治愈的受试者几乎增加了三倍(29.3%),而比较者1(10.4%)和比较者2(12.5%)高。报道的副作用是短暂的,是典型的冷冻疗法。所有治疗均耐受良好。结论测试产品相对于两个比较器的优异固化率可以通过其设计来解释。一氧化二氮(冷却剂),特定的活化方法(将液体冷却剂保持在瓶盖中)和贴合皮肤的聚氨酯泡沫相结合,可获得更高的冷却效率(?80?C)和更有效的疣冻。该试验表明,一氧化二氮装置是一种安全,用户友好且有效的家用疣治疗方法,与使用更高冷冻温度的二甲醚(丙烷)装置相比,无论使用哪种涂抹器类型,都具有优势。资助牡蛎壳实验室。 Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov标识符,NCT03129373。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号