...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics >Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine
【24h】

Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine

机译:使用3D激光扫描仪和坐标测量机比较临床支架点配准

获取原文

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of a laser scanner developed to determine the coordinates of clinical bracket points and to compare with the results of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). METHODS: This diagnostic experimental study was conducted on maxillary and mandibular orthodontic study casts of 18 adults with normal Class I occlusion. First, the coordinates of the bracket points were measured on all casts by a CMM. Then, the three-dimensional coordinates (X, Y, Z) of the bracket points were measured on the same casts by a 3D laser scanner designed at Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. The validity and reliability of each system were assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dahlberg's formula. RESULTS: The difference between the mean dimension and the actual value for the CMM was 0.0066 mm. (95% CI: 69.98340, 69.99140). The mean difference for the laser scanner was 0.107 ± 0.133 mm (95% CI: -0.002, 0.24). In each method, differences were not significant. The ICC comparing the two methods was 0.998 for the X coordinate, and 0.996 for the Y coordinate; the mean difference for coordinates recorded in the entire arch and for each tooth was 0.616 mm. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of clinical bracket point coordinates measured by the laser scanner was equal to that of CMM. The mean difference in measurements was within the range of operator errors.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估开发用于确定临床支架点坐标的激光扫描仪的诊断价值,并将其与坐标测量机(CMM)的结果进行比较。方法:这项诊断性实验研究是对18例I类牙合正常的成年人的上颌和下颌正畸研究模型进行的。首先,由三坐标测量机在所有石膏上测量括号的坐标。然后,在伊朗德黑兰的Shahid Beheshti大学设计的3D激光扫描仪在相同的模型上测量括号的三维坐标(X,Y,Z)。通过类内相关系数(ICC)和Dahlberg公式评估了每个系统的有效性和可靠性。结果:CMM的平均尺寸与实际值之间的差异为0.0066 mm。 (95%CI:69.98340,69.99140)。激光扫描仪的平均差为0.107±0.133毫米(95%CI:-0.002,0.24)。在每种方法中,差异均不显着。比较这两种方法的ICC,X坐标为0.998,Y坐标为0.996;整个牙弓和每个牙齿上记录的坐标的平均差为0.616毫米。结论:激光扫描仪测量的临床支架点坐标的精度与CMM相当。测量值的平均差异在操作员误差范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号