首页> 外文期刊>International journal of osteoarchaeology >Comparison of Coordinate Measurement Precision of Different Landmark Types on Human Crania Using a 3D Laser Scanner and a 3D Digitiser: Implications for Applications of Digital Morphometrics
【24h】

Comparison of Coordinate Measurement Precision of Different Landmark Types on Human Crania Using a 3D Laser Scanner and a 3D Digitiser: Implications for Applications of Digital Morphometrics

机译:使用3D激光扫描仪和3D数字化仪在人类颅骨上不同地标类型的坐标测量精度的比较:对数字形态计量学应用的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A total of 11 340 Cartesian coordinates of 42 homologous landmarks on five excavated human crania were recorded by three observers using a three-dimensional (3D) digitiser and computer models created with a 3D laser scanner. The aim was to compare the errors of the coordinate data of landmarks of different types recorded with these two techniques. The results showed that digitiser-based and 3D model-based coordinate measurements had overall standard deviations of, respectively, -0.79 and -1.05 mm. However, the 3D digitiser yielded the most precise coordinate data for landmarks defined primarily by biological criteria (Type I landmarks), while the 3D laser scanner models yielded the most precise coordinate data for landmarks defined primarily by geometric criteria (Type III landmarks). These findings are likely to influence the research design of future craniometric studies, as they indicate that the suitability of certain landmark types as reference points for geometric operations, such as partial Procrustes analysis, depends on the method by which they are measured. This information is particularly important for retrospective research or for combined databases such as FORDISC or CRANID, which may integrate different types of landmarks recorded by different researchers and/or instruments. Crania displaying poor preservation and surface discoloration yielded larger measurement errors, especially for the 3D model measurements. This is not surprising given that landmarks on 3D models cannot be located using tactile means, but have to be located solely on a visual basis. Nonetheless, even though the digitiser measurements exhibit an overall precision slightly greater than the 3D model measurements, both techniques yield coordinate data with a precision sufficient for most craniometric research.
机译:三个观察员使用三维(3D)数字化仪和使用3D激光扫描仪创建的计算机模型,记录了五个挖掘出的人类颅骨上42个同源地标的总共11340个笛卡尔坐标。目的是比较用这两种技术记录的不同类型地标的坐标数据的误差。结果表明,基于数字化仪和基于3D模型的坐标测量的整体标准偏差分别为-0.79和-1.05 mm。但是,3D数字化仪针对主要由生物学标准(I型地标)定义的地标产生了最精确的坐标数据,而3D激光扫描仪模型针对主要由几何标准(III型地标)定义的地标产生了最精确的坐标数据。这些发现可能会影响未来颅骨测量学的研究设计,因为它们表明某些界标类型作为几何操作参考点的适用性(例如部分Procrustes分析)取决于测量它们的方法。此信息对于回顾性研究或FORDISC或CRANID之类的组合数据库尤其重要,这些数据库可能会整合由不同研究人员和/或仪器记录的不同类型的地标。显示出较差的保存性和表面变色的Crania会产生较大的测量误差,尤其是对于3D模型测量。鉴于3D模型上的地标无法使用触觉方式进行定位,而只能在视觉上进行定位,这不足为奇。尽管如此,即使数字化仪的测量结果显示的整体精度略高于3D模型测量值,但两种技术都能产生具有足够精度的坐标数据,足以进行大多数颅骨测量学研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号