首页> 外文期刊>Dental Materials Journal >Comparative effects of two different artificial body fluids on Candida albicans adhesion to soft lining materials
【24h】

Comparative effects of two different artificial body fluids on Candida albicans adhesion to soft lining materials

机译:两种不同的人造体液对白色念珠菌对软衬材料的粘附力的比较作用

获取原文
           

摘要

This study investigated the C. albicans adhesion to cold- and heat-polymerized soft lining materials that were initially incubated in two different artificial body fluids, namely saliva and nasal secretion, and examined the surface roughness the materials (cold and heat polymerized soft liner) tested in vitro . Cold (Visco Gel) and heat-polymerized (Molloplast B) soft liner specimens (N =32, n =8 per group) (10×10×1.5 mm) were randomly produced to express the relationship between surface roughness and contamination, and influence of body fluids, and incubated in 1.5 ml contaminated solutions for 2 h. After fixation, all of materials were evaluated under optical microscope (×400) and SEM. Surface roughness measurements were examined with profilometre for each material. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD and Dunnett T3 tests (α=0.05). Material type (p <0.05) and contamination media (p <0.05) showed a significant influence on the C. albicans adherence. The surface roughness of cold polymerized soft liner (Visco Gel) was significantly higher than heat-polymerized soft liner (Molloplast B) (p <0.05).
机译:这项研究调查了 C。白念珠对冷热聚合软衬里材料的粘附力,这些材料最初在两种不同的人造体液(即唾液和鼻分泌液)中孵育,并检查了经测试的材料(冷热聚合软衬里)的表面粗糙度 。随机制作冷(Visco Gel)和热聚合(Molloplast B)软衬板样本(每组N = 32,n = 8)(10×10×1.5 mm)以表达表面之间的关系粗糙度和污染,以及体液的影响,并在1.5 ml受污染的溶液中孵育2小时。固定后,所有材料在光学显微镜(×400)和SEM下进行评估。使用每种材料的轮廓仪检查表面粗糙度。使用双向方差分析,Tukey的HSD和Dunnett T3测试(α= 0.05)对数据进行了分析。材料类型(> 0.05)和污染介质(> 0.05)对 C表现出显着影响。白色念珠菌的坚持。冷聚合软衬里(Visco Gel)的表面粗糙度显着高于热聚合软衬里(Molloplast B)(p <0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号