首页> 外文期刊>Dental Research Journal >Comparison of shear bond strength and enamel surface changing between the two?step etching and primer and self?etch primer methods in rebonding of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study
【24h】

Comparison of shear bond strength and enamel surface changing between the two?step etching and primer and self?etch primer methods in rebonding of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study

机译:正畸托槽再粘接中两步蚀刻与底漆和自蚀刻底漆方法之间的剪切粘结强度和搪瓷表面变化的比较:

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS) and enamel surface changing of two methods of bonding in rebonding of orthodontic brackets. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 30 human premolars were randomly classified into three equal groups. Two bonding systems were applied. At first bonding, Group 1 and 2 were bonded by conventional etching and primer technique (CEP) and Group 3 by self?etching primer (SEP). Thermocycling for 5000 cycles was done. Then, 30 brackets were debonded and SBS and Adhesive remnant index (ARI) were evaluated. One sample was selected from each group, for SEM, 30 new brackets were used for rebonding. Group 1 was bonded by CEP method and Group 2 and 3 were bonded by SEP method. Thermocycling, SBS, ARI, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were done in the same protocol of the first bonding. One?way ANOVA, two?sample t?test, and Mann–Whitney U?test were used for statistical analysis. P 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean SBS values were not significantly different between the three groups in the first bonding and rebonding stages (P = 0.22 and 0.24). Further, there was no significant difference between the first bonding and rebonding in SBS values of Groups 1, 2 and 3 (P = 0.44, P = 0.60, and P = 0.56). SEM examination showed obvious differences in the enamel surface between CEP and SEP samples in both first bonding and rebonding. Conclusion: With regard to the advantages of SEP methods, it seems this method can be properly used for rebonding of orthodontic brackets.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是比较在正畸托槽再粘合中两种粘合方法的剪切粘合强度(SBS)和牙釉质表面变化。材料和方法:在这项体外研究中,将30个人类前磨牙随机分为三个相等的组。应用了两个粘合系统。第一次键合时,第1组和第2组通过常规蚀刻和底漆技术(CEP)进行粘合,第3组通过自蚀刻底漆(SEP)进行粘合。完成5000次循环的热循环。然后,将30个托槽剥离,并评估SBS和粘合残余指数(ARI)。从每组中选择一个样品,对于SEM,使用30个新的托架进行再结合。组1通过CEP方法键合,组2和3通过SEP方法键合。热循环,SBS,ARI和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)的操作与第一次键合相同。统计分析采用单向方差分析,两次样本t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。 P <0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:在第一粘合和再粘合阶段,三组之间的平均SBS值没有显着差异(P = 0.22和0.24)。此外,第1、2和3组的SBS值在第一次键合和重新键合之间没有显着差异(P = 0.44,P = 0.60和P = 0.56)。 SEM检查显示,在首次粘结和再粘结中,CEP和SEP样品之间的釉质表面存在明显差异。结论:关于SEP方法的优点,看来该方法可以正确地用于正畸托槽的重新粘接。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号