...
首页> 外文期刊>ZooKeys >Looking back on a decade of barcoding crustaceans
【24h】

Looking back on a decade of barcoding crustaceans

机译:回首条形码甲壳动物的十年

获取原文
           

摘要

Species identification represents a pivotal component for large-scale biodiversity studies and conservation planning but represents a challenge for many taxa when using morphological traits only. Consequently, alternative identification methods based on molecular markers have been proposed. In this context, DNA barcoding has become a popular and accepted method for the identification of unknown animals across all life stages by comparison to a reference library. In this review we examine the progress of barcoding studies for the Crustacea using the Web of Science data base from 2003 to 2014. All references were classified in terms of taxonomy covered, subject area (identification/library, genetic variability, species descriptions, phylogenetics, methods, pseudogenesumts), habitat, geographical area, authors, journals, citations, and the use of the Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD). Our analysis revealed a total number of 164 barcoding studies for crustaceans with a preference for malacostracan crustaceans, in particular Decapoda, and for building reference libraries in order to identify organisms. So far, BOLD did not establish itself as a popular informatics platform among carcinologists although it offers many advantages for standardized data storage, analyses and publication.
机译:物种鉴定是大规模生物多样性研究和保护规划的关键组成部分,但在仅使用形态性状的情况下,对许多生物分类而言也是一个挑战。因此,已经提出了基于分子标记的替代性鉴定方法。在这种情况下,通过与参考文库进行比较,DNA条码已成为一种流行的,公认的方法,用于识别所有生命阶段的未知动物。在本综述中,我们使用Web of Science数据库从2003年至2014年检查了甲壳动物的条形码研究进展。所有参考文献均按照分类法,主题领域(标识/库,遗传变异,物种描述,系统发育,方法,假基因/数字),栖息地,地理区域,作者,期刊,引文以及生命条形码系统(BOLD)的使用。我们的分析显示,共有164项针对甲壳类动物的条形码研究,其中优先选择了malacostracan甲壳类动物(尤其是十足目),并建立了参考库以鉴定生物。到目前为止,尽管BOLD在标准化数据存储,分析和发布方面具有许多优势,但它并没有将其确立为在癌症学家中流行的信息学平台。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号