首页> 外文期刊>Danishgah-i Ulum-i Pizishki va Khadamat-i Bihdashti-Darmani Shahid Sadugi Yazd. Majallah >Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Digital Radiography and Temporal Digital Subtraction Radiography in Detection of Dentinal Caries Progression
【24h】

Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Digital Radiography and Temporal Digital Subtraction Radiography in Detection of Dentinal Caries Progression

机译:数字射线照相和时间数字减影射线照相对牙本质龋进展的诊断价值比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: The development and progress of computerized technologies has revolutionized radiology with digital imaging. The aim of this study is to compare Digital Radiography(DR) and Temporal Digital Subtraction (TDS)in detection of dentinal caries progression.Methods: 27carious teeth were placed in separate vials of sterile buffer solution after extraction .Three radiopaque restorations were placed in each tooth to aid in the alignment of successive radiographs. Each tooth was then mounted in poly methylmethacrylate and then incubated at 37°c in saliva buffer containing 5% glucose for 7hours per day, 5 days a week for 8 weeks.Each day after the7hour incubation period, each tooth was washed with 25ml of salivary buffer and placed in 50ml of salivary buffer at 37°c until the next cycling day and the PH in the medium was maintained above5.Digital radiographs were taken for each tooth on day 1 and then at week 2?4?6 and 8. The images were subtracted and results were recorded and analyzed using SPSS software.Results: Statistical calculation showed a meaningful difference between the two methods. In other words, the progression of caries was more readily detected by the TDS technique such that during the first two weeks, diagnostic value of TDS was more than DR, but in the later stages, progression of caries was detected similarly by the two methods.Conclusion: It has been demonstrated that TDS is a more sensitive method for detecting change in tooth mineral content.
机译:简介:计算机技术的发展和进步彻底改变了放射学与数字成像技术。本研究的目的是比较数字放射线照相术(DR)和颞部数字减影术(TDS)在检测龋齿进展中的应用。方法:提取后将27颗龋齿放入无菌缓冲液的小瓶中,每组分别放置3个不透射线的修复体牙齿,以帮助连续的射线照片对齐。然后将每颗牙齿固定在聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯中,然后在含5%葡萄糖的唾液缓冲液中于37°C每天孵育7小时,每周5天,共8周。孵育7小时后的每一天,每只牙齿用25ml唾液洗涤将缓冲液置于37°C的50ml唾液缓冲液中直到下一个循环日,并且培养基中的PH值保持在5以上。在第1天,然后在第2、4、6和8周对每颗牙齿进行数字X射线照相。减去图像并使用SPSS软件记录结果并进行分析。结果:统计学计算表明这两种方法之间存在显着差异。换句话说,通过TDS技术更容易检测到龋齿的进展,因此在前两周,TDS的诊断价值要比DR更高,但是在后期,通过两种方法检测到龋齿的进展类似。结论:已证明TDS是检测牙齿矿物质含量变化的更灵敏方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号