首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Looking beyond general metrics for model comparison – lessons from an international model intercomparison study
【24h】

Looking beyond general metrics for model comparison – lessons from an international model intercomparison study

机译:超越常规指标进行模型比较–国际模型比对研究的经验教训

获取原文
           

摘要

International collaboration between research institutes and universities is a promising way to reach consensus on hydrological model development. Although model comparison studies are very valuable for international cooperation, they do often not lead to very clear new insights regarding the relevance of the modelled processes. We hypothesise that this is partly caused by model complexity and the comparison methods used, which focus too much on a good overall performance instead of focusing on a variety of specific events. In this study, we use an approach that focuses on the evaluation of specific events and characteristics. Eight international research groups calibrated their hourly model on the Ourthe catchment in Belgium and carried out a validation in time for the Ourthe catchment and a validation in space for nested and neighbouring catchments. The same protocol was followed for each model and an ensemble of best-performing parameter sets was selected. Although the models showed similar performances based on general metrics (i.e. the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency), clear differences could be observed for specific events. We analysed the hydrographs of these specific events and conducted three types of statistical analyses on the entire time series: cumulative discharges, empirical extreme value distribution of the peak flows and flow duration curves for low flows. The results illustrate the relevance of including a very quick flow reservoir preceding the root zone storage to model peaks during low flows and including a slow reservoir in parallel with the fast reservoir to model the recession for the studied catchments. This intercomparison enhanced the understanding of the hydrological functioning of the catchment, in particular for low flows, and enabled to identify present knowledge gaps for other parts of the hydrograph. Above all, it helped to evaluate each model against a set of alternative models.
机译:科研机构与大学之间的国际合作是在水文模型开发方面达成共识的一种有前途的方式。尽管模型比较研究对于国际合作非常有价值,但它们通常不能带来关于建模过程相关性的非常清晰的新见解。我们假设这部分是由于模型的复杂性和所使用的比较方法引起的,它们过于注重整体性能,而不是关注各种特定事件。在这项研究中,我们使用的方法侧重于特定事件和特征的评估。八个国际研究小组在比利时的Ourthe流域校准了其小时模型,并及时对Ourthe流域进行了验证,并对嵌套和邻近集水区进行了空间验证。每个模型都遵循相同的协议,并选择了一组性能最佳的参数集。尽管基于一般指标(即Nash& Sutcliffe效率),这些模型显示出相似的性能,但是对于特定事件可以观察到明显的差异。我们分析了这些特定事件的水位图,并对整个时间序列进行了三种类型的统计分析:累积流量,峰值流量的经验极值分布以及低流量的流量持续时间曲线。结果说明了在根流区之前包括一个非常快速的流量储层以模拟低流量时的峰值的相关性,并包括一个与快速储层并行的慢速储层以模拟所研究流域的衰退的相关性。这种比对增进了对流域水文功能的理解,特别是对于低流量的流域,并使得能够确定水文图其他部分目前的知识差距。最重要的是,它有助于根据一组替代模型评估每个模型。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号