...
首页> 外文期刊>HYDRO Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment >The 1996 Mahakali Treaty: Whither the “Rashtriya Sankalpas/National Strictures” of Nepalese Parliament?
【24h】

The 1996 Mahakali Treaty: Whither the “Rashtriya Sankalpas/National Strictures” of Nepalese Parliament?

机译:1996年的《马哈卡利条约》:请问尼泊尔议会是“ Rashtriya Sankalpas /国家机构”吗?

获取原文

摘要

Despite the ratification by the Joint Session of Nepal’s two Houses of Parliament with an overwhelming majority on September 20, 1996 and despite the exchange of instruments of ratification by the two countries on June 5, 1997, the Pancheshwar Detailed Project Report (DPR) has yet to see the light of day even after the lapse of 16 years. It was believed that Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba’s government with the concurrence of the main opposition party, Communist Party of Nepal- United Marxist Leninist (CPN-UML), had ratified the Mahakali Treaty with four ‘rashtriya sankalpasational strictures’. It was also believed that an all party Parliamentary Monitoring Joint Committee headed by the Speaker of the Lower House was constituted to guide the Nepalese side in the preparation of the detailed project report of Pancheshwar. That Monitoring Joint Committee in a span of four years held 28 meetings. Now the very legality of those four ‘rashtriya sankalpasational strictures’ is being questioned. In 2009 the Secretary level Nepal-India Joint Committee on Water Resources constituted the Pancheshwar Development Authority (PDA) that was given the crucial mandate to ‘finalize’ the vital much-awaited Pancheshwar DPR. As institutions have no memory and public memory is extremely short, this article attempts to recapitulate the commitments made at treaty ratification time by the Deuba government in concurrence with the then largest party, CPN-UML. The article argues against the mandate given to the bureaucrat-led PDA to finalize the Pancheshwar DPR and strongly recommends formation of an all party mechanism akin to the previous Parliamentary Monitoring Joint Committee to guide the government during this critical Interim period. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hn.v11i0.7155 Hydro Nepal Vol.11 2011 pp.12-17
机译:尽管1996年9月20日以压倒多数的尼泊尔两院联席会议批准了该协议,尽管两国于1997年6月5日交换了批准书,但Pancheshwar详细项目报告(DPR)尚未发布即使过去了16年也能看到一天的光明。人们认为,总理谢尔·巴哈杜尔·杜巴(Sher Bahadur Deuba)的政府在主要反对党尼泊尔共产党和马克思主义列宁主义者(CPN-UML)的同意下,批准了《马哈卡利条约》,其中有4项“ rashtriya sankalpas /国家规章”。人们还认为,由下议院议长率领的全党议会监督联合委员会的组成是为了指导尼泊尔方面编写潘切什瓦尔的详细项目报告。该监测联合委员会在四年的时间里共举行了28次会议。现在,人们质疑这四个“ rashtriya sankalpas /国家规章制度”的合法性。 2009年,秘书级别的尼泊尔-印度水资源联合委员会组建了Pancheshwar发展局(PDA),其关键任务是“完成”人们期待已久的重要Pancheshwar DPR。由于机构没有记忆力,公共记忆力非常短,因此本文试图概括杜巴政府在当时条约批准时与当时最大的政党CPN-UML达成的承诺。这篇文章反对由官僚领导的PDA最终完成Pancheshwar DPR的任务,并强烈建议建立一个类似于先前的议会监督联合委员会的全党机制,以在这个关键的过渡时期指导政府。 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hn.v11i0.7155 Hydro Nepal 2011年第11卷第12-17页

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号