...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Comparison of different base flow separation methods in a lowland catchment
【24h】

Comparison of different base flow separation methods in a lowland catchment

机译:低地流域不同基流分离方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Assessment of water resources available in different storages and movingalong different pathways in a catchment is important for its optimal use andprotection, and also for the prediction of floods and low flows. Moreover,understanding of the runoff generation processes is essential for assessingthe impacts of climate and land use changes on the hydrological response ofa catchment. Many methods for base flow separation exist, but hardly onefocuses on the specific behaviour of temperate lowland areas. This paperpresents the results of a base flow separation study carried out in alowland area in the Netherlands. In this study, field observations ofprecipitation, groundwater and surface water levels and discharges, togetherwith tracer analysis are used to understand the runoff generation processesin the catchment. Several tracer and non-tracer based base flow separationmethods were applied to the discharge time series, and their results arecompared.The results show that groundwater levels react fast to precipitation eventsin this lowland area with shallow groundwater tables. Moreover, a goodcorrelation was found between groundwater levels and discharges suggestingthat most of the measured discharge also during floods comes fromgroundwater storage. It was estimated using tracer hydrological approachesthat approximately 90% of the total discharge is groundwater displaced byevent water mainly infiltrating in the northern part of the catchment, andonly the remaining 10% is surface runoff. The impact of remote rechargecausing displacement of near channel groundwater during floods could also bemotivated with hydraulic approximations. The results show further that whenbase flow separation is meant to identify groundwater contributions tostream flow, process based methods (e.g. the rating curve method; Kliner andKnezek, 1974) are more reliable than other simple non-tracer based methods.Also, the recursive filtering method (proposed by Eckhardt, 2005) can becalibrated well using the results of tracer investigation giving goodresults. Consequently, non-tracer based base flow separation methods thatcan be validated for some events may provide a powerful tool for groundwaterassessment or model calibration/validation in lowland areas.
机译:对流域内不同水库和沿不同路径移动的可用水资源进行评估,对于优化利用和保护水资源以及预测洪水和低流量至关重要。此外,对径流产生过程的了解对于评估气候和土地利用变化对流域水文响应的影响至关重要。存在许多用于基础流分离的方法,但几乎没有一种方法专注于温带低地地区的特定行为。本文介绍了在荷兰低地地区进行的基础流分离研究的结果。在这项研究中,对降水,地下水和地表水的水位和流量的实地观测以及示踪分析被用于了解集水区径流的产生过程。将几种基于示踪剂和非示踪剂的基本流分离方法应用于排放时间序列,并比较了它们的结果。 结果表明,在地下水位较低的低地,地下水位对降水事件反应迅速。此外,在地下水位和流量之间发现了良好的相关性,这表明洪水期间大部分测得的流量也来自地下水存储。使用示踪水文方法估计,总排放量中约有90%是由主要渗入集水区北部的事件水驱替的地下水,而仅剩余的10%是地表径流。洪水造成的远程补给对洪水的影响也可以通过水力近似来激发。结果进一步表明,当用基础流分离法确定地下水对水流的贡献时,基于过程的方法(例如等级曲线法; Kliner和Knezek,1974年)比其他基于非示踪剂的简单方法更为可靠。 (由Eckhardt提出,2005年)可以使用示踪剂调查的结果很好地进行校准。因此,可以针对某些事件进行验证的基于非示踪剂的基本流分离方法可以为低地地区的地下水评估或模型校准/验证提供强大的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号