首页> 外文期刊>Human Resources for Health >Assessing the impact of a new health sector pay system upon NHS staff in England
【24h】

Assessing the impact of a new health sector pay system upon NHS staff in England

机译:评估新的卫生部门薪酬体系对英国NHS员工的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Pay and pay systems are a critical element in any health sector human resource strategy. Changing a pay system can be one strategy to achieve or sustain organizational change. This paper reports on the design and implementation of a completely new pay system in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. 'Agenda for Change' constituted the largest-ever attempt to introduce a new pay system in the UK public services, covering more than one million staff. Its objectives were to improve the delivery of patient care as well as enhance staff recruitment, retention and motivation, and to facilitate new ways of working. Methods This study was the first independent assessment of the impact of Agenda for Change at a local and national level. The methods used in the research were a literature review; review of 'grey' unpublished documentation provided by key stakeholders in the process; analysis of available data; interviews with key national informants (representing government, employers and trade unions), and case studies conducted with senior human resource managers in ten NHS hospitals in England Results Most of the NHS trust managers interviewed were in favour of Agenda for Change, believing it would assist in delivering improvements in patient care and staff experience. The main benefits highlighted were: 'fairness', moving different staff groups on to harmonized conditions; equal pay claim 'protection'; and scope to introduce new roles and working practices. Conclusion Agenda for Change took several years to design, and has only recently been implemented. Its very scale and central importance to NHS costs and delivery of care argues for a full assessment at an early stage so that lessons can be learned and any necessary changes made. This paper highlights weaknesses in evaluation and limitations in progress. The absence of systematically derived and applied impact indicators makes it difficult to assess impact and impact variations. Similarly, the lack of any full and systematic evaluation constrained the overall potential for Agenda for Change to deliver improvements to the NHS.
机译:背景技术薪酬制度是任何卫生部门人力资源战略中的关键要素。改变薪酬制度可能是实现或维持组织变革的一种策略。本文报告了英格兰国家卫生局(NHS)中全新薪酬系统的设计和实施情况。 “变革议程”是有史以来最大规模的尝试,目的是在英国公共服务部门引入新的薪酬体系,覆盖超过100万名员工。其目标是改善患者护理的提供,并增加人员的招聘,保留和激励,并促进新的工作方式。方法该研究是对《变革议程》在地方和国家层面的影响的首次独立评估。研究中使用的方法是文献综述;审查过程中主要利益相关者提供的“灰色”未发布文档;分析可用数据;与关键的国家线人(代表政府,雇主和工会)进行访谈,以及在英格兰的10家NHS医院中与高级人力资源经理进行案例研究。结果受访的大多数NHS信托经理都赞成《变革议程》,认为这会有所帮助改善患者护理和员工体验。强调的主要好处是:“公平”,使不同的工作人员群体适应统一的条件;同工同酬索赔“保护”;以及引入新角色和工作实践的范围。结论变革议程花了几年时间设计,直到最近才得以实施。它对NHS费用和医疗服务的规模和核心重要性要求在早期进行全面评估,以便可以吸取教训并进行必要的更改。本文强调了评估的弱点和进行中的局限性。由于缺乏系统得出和应用的影响指标,因此难以评估影响和影响变化。同样,缺乏任何全面和系统的评估也限制了《变革议程》为NHS带来改进的整体潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号