首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Vormt moderne antropologie een probleem voor het Christelijk geloof?
【24h】

Vormt moderne antropologie een probleem voor het Christelijk geloof?

机译:现代人类学是基督教信仰的问题吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

Does modern anthropology pose a problem to the Christian faith? Contemporary scientific anthropology proposes a naturalistic conception of human personhood because of humankind's place somewhere in the larger evolutionary process of life. Some authors use the theory of biological evolution to explain phenomena in other areas as well, and due to its success suggest it has universal application in cultural and religious studies too, as if it were a theory of everything. Darwin's idea of a common origin of all life undermined a supposed superiority of humankind. It signalled the end of an Aristotelian metaphysical notion of classification and constituted a real blow for classical individualistic anthropology. Dawkins explains religion in terms of empirical immanent biological processes in the human brain. He views religious ideas as ‘memes' that act like an infectious virus in mental processes. His hypothesis seems to be a relapse into the old Aristotelian pattern. Michael Persinger interprets religion as an internal physiological state of an individual brain and reduces the language of mental concepts to physiological states of a material brain. Persinger's, and also Dennett's, materialistic view presupposes a God's Eye Point of View as an Archimedian perspective outside the world. If a God exists, the neurologists Newberg and d'Aquili argue that he needs a point of contact within our brain: the God spot. Sociobiologists Edward Wilson and David Wilson consider religion a form of group adaptation, because cooperating individuals show the primary benefits of cooperation and altruistic behaviour, just as social insects. Religion is an evolutionary support of altruistic instincts and creates a social infrastructure to benefit a cooperative society. However, social insects merely act on their instincts whereas human beings can act intentionally even against their primary instincts, because of motives for altruist practices inspired, for example, by the narratives and concepts of a Christian tradition. The communion of saints does not take place merely because of a social instinct, but because of the shared motive of the community as a whole, that is, the body of Christ, which acts altruistically irrespective of persons, including outsiders!
机译:现代人类学是否对基督教信仰构成了问题?由于人类在更大的生命进化过程中的某个地方,当代科学人类学提出了一种自然的人格观念。一些作者也使用生物进化理论来解释其他领域的现象,并且由于其成功,表明它在文化和宗教研究中也具有普遍应用,就好像它是一切理论一样。达尔文关于所有生命的共同起源的想法破坏了人类应有的优越性。它标志着亚里士多德形而上学的分类学概念的终结,对古典个人主义人类学构成了真正的打击。道金斯以人脑中经验固有的生物过程来解释宗教。他认为宗教观念是“模因”,在心理过程中就像一种传染性病毒。他的假设似乎重演了旧的亚里士多德模式。迈克尔·珀辛格(Michael Persinger)将宗教解释为单个大脑的内部生理状态,并将心理概念的语言简化为物质大脑的生理状态。 Persinger以及Dennett的唯物主义观点都以上帝的视点作为世界以外的阿基米德观点为前提。如果有上帝存在,神经学家纽伯格和阿奎利认为,他需要我们大脑内的一个接触点:上帝点。社会生物学家爱德华·威尔逊(Edward Wilson)和戴维·威尔逊(David Wilson)将宗教视为群体适应的一种形式,因为合作的个人表现出合作和利他行为的主要好处,就像社交昆虫一样。宗教是利他本能的进化支持,并创造了有利于合作社的社会基础设施。但是,社交昆虫只是按照自己的直觉行事,而人类甚至可以针对自己的主要直觉而有意识地行事,这是由于利他主义实践的动机,例如受到基督教传统的叙事和观念的启发。圣徒的交往不仅仅是因为社会的本能,而是因为整个社区(即基督的身体)的共同动机,而基督的身体在利他行为上无视任何人,包括外来者!

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号