首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >A generous ontology: Identity as a process of intersubjective discovery – An African theological contribution
【24h】

A generous ontology: Identity as a process of intersubjective discovery – An African theological contribution

机译:慷慨的本体论:身份作为主体间发现的过程–非洲神学的贡献

获取原文
       

摘要

The answer to the question ‘who am I?' is of fundamental importance to being human. Answers to this question have traditionally been sought from various disciplines and sources, which include empirical sources, such as biology and sociology, and phenomenological sources, such as psychology and religion. Although the approaches are varied, they have the notion of foundational truth, whether from an objective or subjective perspective, in common. The question of human identity that is the subject of this paper is germinated from the title of a book by WITS academic, Ivor Chipkin, entitled, Do South Africans exist? Nationalism, democracy and the identity of ‘the people' (2007). This paper does not discuss Chipkin's thoughts on nationalism and democracy; however, it considered the matter of human identity that is raised by his question. The approach taken by this paper on the notion of identity was significantly influenced by Brian McLaren's postmodernist approach to Christian doctrine as outlined in his book A generous orthodoxy (2004) – a term coined by Yale Theologian, Hans Frei. The inadequacies of traditional approaches to human identity and consciousness that are based upon ‘foundational knowledge' were thus considered. Both subjective and objective approaches to identity were touched upon, showing the weaknesses of these approaches in dealing with the complex nature of true human identity. The paper then presented an integrative framework for individual consciousness that is not static or ultimately quantifiable, but rather formulated in the process of mutual discovery that arises from a shared journey. The approach presented here drew strongly upon the groundbreaking work of Ken Wilber and Eugene de Quincey and related their ontological systems to the intersubjective approach to identity that can be found in the African philosophy and theology of ‘ubuntu'. This paper focused on how the ethics and theology of this indigenous knowledge system can contribute toward overcoming the impasse of validating individual identity in contemporary academic debates on human consciousness.
机译:“我是谁?”问题的答案对成为人类至关重要。传统上,已经从各种学科和来源中寻求该问题的答案,这些来源包括经验来源,例如生物学和社会学,以及现象学来源,例如心理学和宗教。尽管方法各异,但无论从客观还是主观的角度来看,它们都有基本真理的概念。 WITS学者Ivor Chipkin的书名标题为“南非人存在吗?”,这是本文的主题。民族主义,民主和“人民”的身份(2007年)。本文没有讨论奇普金的民族主义和民主思想;但是,它考虑了他的问题引起的人类身份问题。布莱恩·麦克拉伦(Brian McLaren)的后现代主义对基督教学说的方法,在耶鲁神学学家汉斯·弗赖(Hans Frei)的第2004年著作中概述了这一观点,该论文对身份概念的采用方法产生了重大影响。因此考虑了基于“基础知识”的传统的人类身份和意识方法的不足。涉及身份的主观和客观方法都被提及,显示了这些方法在处理真实人类身份的复杂性方面的弱点。然后,论文提出了一个个人意识的综合框架,该框架不是静态的或最终可量化的,而是在共享旅程中产生的相互发现过程中制定的。这里介绍的方法极大地借鉴了Ken Wilber和Eugene de Quincey的开创性工作,并将它们的本体论系统与主体间的身份认同方法联系在一起,这种方法可以在非洲“ ubuntu”哲学和神学中找到。本文重点讨论了这种本土知识体系的伦理学和神学如何有助于克服当代关于人类意识的学术辩论中验证个人身份的僵局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号