首页> 外文期刊>Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry >John E. Lesch (ed.): 'The German Chemical Industry in the Twentieth Century
【24h】

John E. Lesch (ed.): 'The German Chemical Industry in the Twentieth Century

机译:约翰·E·莱施(John E. Lesch)(编辑):“二十世纪的德国化学工业

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The early modern appropriations of Hippocrates lay bare the ideological us-es of history. The hermeneutical pliabil-ity of the Hippocratic figure made it possible for the legendary Greek physi-cian to become at once the champion of iatrophysics and the original iatrochem-ist. But the variegated gallery of the ear-ly modern Hippocrates reminds us once more that dealing with the medico-chemical debate in terms of a polariza-tion between vitalism and mechanism is unsatisfactory and misleading. In medi-cine, the adoption of the reassuring di-chotomy between Aristotelian natural-ism and mechanical philosophy is not so easy as in the physical sciences. Debus' introduction of the notion of 'chemical philosophy' was timely and it still is be-cause it aids the development of a more complex historical panorama. But pre-cisely because of this complexity, the category of chemical philosophy, not merely a heading for spagiric naturalism, turns out to be more varied than the Paracelso-Helmontian one: one has only to think of reluctant alchemists like Robert Boyle, of 'chymical Galenists' like George Castle and Francis Glisson, and of chemical iatrophysicists like Gio-vanni Alfonso Borelli and Marcello Malpighi. The principal merit of Debus' book lies precisely in relieving readers of their 'isms' and exposing them to the complexity of the early modern inter-play between medicine and chemistry, rising mechanical philosophies and still influential naturalisms. Guido Giglioni: Dibner Institute for the History of Science and Technology, 38 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.; giglio29@hotmail.com The German Chemical Industry in the Twentieth Century, ed. by JOHN E.LESCH, Kluwer Academic Pub-lisher, Dordrecht, 2000, viii + 472 pp., EUR 163.50 [ISBN 0-7923-6487-2].
机译:希波克拉底的早期现代拨款暴露了历史上的意识形态用途。希波克拉底人物的诠释性使这位传奇的希腊物理学家有可能立即成为国际物理学的冠军和原始的化学家。但是,早期的现代希波克拉底画廊杂乱无章的画廊再次提醒我们,从生命主义和机制之间的极化出发,对药物化学辩论进行处理是不令人满意的和令人误解的。在医学中,采用亚里士多德自然主义与机械哲学之间令人放心的二分法并不像物理学那样容易。德布斯(Debus)适时引入了“化学哲学”(Chemical Philosophy)概念,因为它有助于发展更复杂的历史全景图,所以它之所以仍然如此。但恰恰是由于这种复杂性,化学哲学的范畴不仅是散乱的自然主义,而且比Paracelso-Helmontian的多元得多:人们只需要想到像Robert Boyle这样的勉强的炼金术士,像乔治城堡(George Castle)和弗朗西斯·格里森(Francis Glisson)这样的化学加仑主义者,以及乔瓦尼·阿方索·波雷利(Gio-vanni Alfonso Borelli)和马塞洛·马尔皮吉(Marcello Malpighi)等化学营养学家。德布斯(Debus)这本书的主要优点恰恰在于使读者摆脱他们的“主义”,并使他们暴露于医学与化学之间的早期现代相互作用,复杂的机械哲学和仍然具有影响力的自然主义的复杂性。吉多·吉利奥尼(Guido Giglioni):迪布纳科学技术史研究所,纪念馆大道38号,美国马萨诸塞州02139; giglio29@hotmail.com《二十世纪的德国化学工业》,编辑。约翰·E·莱斯(JOHN E.LESCH),克鲁夫学术出版社,多德雷赫特,2000年,viii + 472页,欧元163.50 [ISBN 0-7923-6487-2]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号