...
首页> 外文期刊>Horticulturae >Growth and Tissue Elemental Composition Response of Butterhead Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa , cv. Flandria) to Hydroponic and Aquaponic Conditions
【24h】

Growth and Tissue Elemental Composition Response of Butterhead Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa , cv. Flandria) to Hydroponic and Aquaponic Conditions

机译:莴苣(Lactuca sativa,cv。Flandria)对水培和水培条件的生长和组织元素组成的反应。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The primary objective of this research was to compare lettuce performance under conventional hydroponics at pH 5.8 (referred to as H5), hydroponics at pH 7.0 (referred to as H7), and recirculated aquaponic water at pH 7.0 (referred to as A7). Aquaponic nutrients were supplied by continuously recirculating water between a fish rearing system (recirculating aquaculture system or RAS) and the lettuce growing system (with the sole addition being chelated iron). This paper builds upon our previous research where we found that H7 produced 26% less shoot fresh weight (FW) growth than H5 and an 18% reduction in dry weight (DW). In this research, we also evaluated the inorganic hydroponics nutrient solution at pH 7.0 (H7) to provide continuity between experiments and to isolate the pH effect. The A7 plant biomass responses were not different from H5 in all biomass response categories. H7 was different from H5 in shoot FW, DW, and DW/FW, as well as root FW and DW. H7 was different from the A7 in shoot FW, DW/FW, and root DW. There were no tissue elemental differences between H5 and H7 except Cu. The Ca and Na contents differed between H5 and A7, while the microelements Mn, Mo, and Zn differed. Generally, the elemental tissue differences between treatments were proportional to the differences for the same elements in the nutrient solutions. Aquaponic systems are often viewed to be more complicated and more risky because two complex systems are being joined (hydroponics plus RAS). However, the aquaponics system proved to be surprisingly simple to manage in daily operations. Our data suggested that the aquaponics system (A7), which was operated at a higher pH 7.0, was able to offset any negative biomass and elemental effects that occurred in the inorganic hydroponic pH 7.0 treatment (H7) from its increased pH and less optimized nutrient solution elemental concentrations.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是比较在pH 5.8的常规水培法(称为H5),pH 7.0的水培法(称为H7)和pH 7.0的水培水(称为A7)下的生菜性能。通过在鱼类饲养系统(循环水产养殖系统或RAS)和生菜生长系统(唯一添加的是螯合铁)之间连续循环水来提供水产养分。本文基于我们之前的研究,我们发现H7的芽鲜重(FW)增长比H5少26%,干重(DW)减少18%。在这项研究中,我们还评估了pH 7.0(H7)下的无机水培营养液,以提供实验之间的连续性并隔离pH值的影响。在所有生物量响应类别中,A7植物生物量响应均与H5相同。 H7与H5在茎部FW,DW和DW / FW以及根部FW和DW方面有所不同。 H7与A7在拍摄FW,DW / FW和根DW方面有所不同。除铜外,H5和H7之间没有组织元素差异。 H5和A7之间的Ca和Na含量不同,而微量元素Mn,Mo和Zn不同。通常,处理之间的基本组织差异与营养液中相同元素的差异成正比。由于将两个复杂的系统(水培法和RAS法)结合在一起,水培系统通常被认为更复杂,风险更大。然而,鱼菜共生系统被证明在日常操作中易于管理。我们的数据表明,在pH 7.0较高的条件下运行的水培系统(A7)能够抵消pH值升高和营养成分优化不足而对无机水培pH 7.0处理(H7)产生的任何负面生物量和元素影响。溶液元素浓度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号