...
首页> 外文期刊>Humanities >Clashing Concepts and Methods: Assessing Excellence in the Humanities and Social Sciences
【24h】

Clashing Concepts and Methods: Assessing Excellence in the Humanities and Social Sciences

机译:冲突的概念和方法:评估人文社会科学领域的卓越水平

获取原文
           

摘要

The humanities are going through a period of exceptional vitality characterised by the proliferation of novel interpretative frameworks, methodologies and perspectives. Yet they—and, to a lesser extent, the social sciences—feel threatened by the rising tide of research assessment which appear to be predominantly derived from the needs and experience of the physical and natural sciences and depend on the application of standardized assessment tools. This position paper intends to contribute to the debate on the current criteria of evaluation and measures for excellence in the Humanities by casting light on their conceptual implications and methodological assumptions. It argues that decisions about their relative weight are not simply technical but also reflect underlying value systems.
机译:人文学科正经历着一段异常活跃的时期,其特征是新颖的解释框架,方法论和观点的泛滥。然而,它们(以及在较小程度上是社会科学)受到研究评估不断上升的趋势的威胁,研究评估似乎主要来自自然科学和自然科学的需求和经验,并依赖于标准化评估工具的应用。该立场文件旨在通过阐明人文学科的概念含义和方法论假设,为有关人文学科当前评价标准和卓越措施的辩论做出贡献。它认为,关于其相对权重的决定不仅是技术上的,而且还反映了潜在的价值体系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号