首页> 外文期刊>Healthcare policy >Panning for Population Gold: 20 Years of Research at MCHP Healthcare Policy Vol. 6 Special Issue
【24h】

Panning for Population Gold: 20 Years of Research at MCHP Healthcare Policy Vol. 6 Special Issue

机译:人口淘金:MCHP Healthcare Policy Vol。20年研究。 6特刊

获取原文
           

摘要

This session started with Dr. Marchessault presenting highlights from her research project, "The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy: A Case Study" (see pages 29–43 of this Special Issue). Semi-structured interviews with 28 participants revealed that a multitude of factors were involved in establishing MCHP. Donald Orchard, then Minister of Health for Manitoba, and Deputy Minister Frank Maynard initiated discussions about creating a research centre. They were motivated by a need for information to guide decisions they faced in an era of financial pressure, by influential presentations from figures including Dr. Fraser Mustard and by the international reputation of Drs. Noralou Roos and Leslie Roos. They saw the benefit of having information come from a reliable source outside of government and wanted to "put some science behind some of the decisions we were making." Mr. Orchard was willing to take the political risk in order to advance healthcare in Manitoba. Fortunately, Manitoba had excellent electronic records of the population and their health services use – data that the Rooses had been working with for 15 years, achieving exemplary scholarship. Manitoba was small enough that the entire data system was manageable given the computing power of the day. Small size also facilitated cooperation among managers of different sectors. Leadership from Dr. Brian Postl, head of the University of Manitoba's Department of Community Health Sciences, Dr. John Wade, dean of the Faculty of Medicine, and Dr. Arnold Naimark, president of the University of Manitoba, helped establish an appropriate budget and agenda for research projects, as well as systems to protect academic freedom to publish without government interference. The structure of the MCHP advisory board balances university and government interests, and the process of negotiating research topics ensures that questions of relevance to the government are addressed while taking advantage of the strengths of the data system.
机译:本次会议以马歇索博士介绍其研究项目“曼尼托巴卫生政策中心:案例研究”为重点(请参阅本期特刊第29-43页)。对28位参与者进行的半结构化访谈显示,建立MCHP涉及多种因素。时任马尼托巴卫生部长的唐纳德·奥查德(Donald Orchard)和副部长弗兰克·梅纳德(Frank Maynard)发起了关于建立研究中心的讨论。他们受到信息需求的指导,以指导他们在财务压力时代所面临的决策,Fraser Mustard博士等人物的有影响力的演讲以及Drs的国际声誉。 Noralou Roos和Leslie Roos。他们看到了从政府之外的可靠来源获得信息的好处,并希望“在我们正在做出的某些决定中加入一些科学依据”。 Orchard先生愿意承担政治风险,以促进曼尼托巴省的医疗保健。幸运的是,曼尼托巴省拥有有关人口及其医疗服务使用的出色电子记录-罗斯夫妇已经工作15年的数据,获得了杰出的奖学金。曼尼托巴(Manitoba)足够小,鉴于当今的计算能力,整个数据系统都是可管理的。规模小还促进了不同部门管理人员之间的合作。曼尼托巴大学社区卫生科学系主任Brian Postl博士,医学系主任John Wade博士和曼尼托巴大学校长Arnold Naimark博士的领导帮助制定了适当的预算,研究项目的议程,以及保护学术自由而不受政府干预的制度。 MCHP咨询委员会的结构平衡了大学和政府的利益,而研究主题的协商过程确保了在利用数据系统优势的同时,解决了与政府相关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号