Prospective multi-centre randomised, double-blind, equivalence study comparing clonidine and midazolam as intravenous sedative agents in critically ill children. The SLEEPS Study (Safety ProfiLe, Efficacy and Equivalence in Paediatric intensive care Sedation)

Wolf?A; McKay?A; Spowart?C; Granville?H; Boland?A; Petrou?S; Sutherland?A; Gamble?C

首页> 外文期刊>Health technology assessment: HTA >Prospective multi-centre randomised, double-blind, equivalence study comparing clonidine and midazolam as intravenous sedative agents in critically ill children. The SLEEPS Study (Safety ProfiLe, Efficacy and Equivalence in Paediatric intensive care Sedation)

【24h】

Prospective multi-centre randomised, double-blind, equivalence study comparing clonidine and midazolam as intravenous sedative agents in critically ill children. The SLEEPS Study (Safety ProfiLe, Efficacy and Equivalence in Paediatric intensive care Sedation)

机译：前瞻性多中心，双盲，等效性研究比较了可乐定和咪达唑仑作为危重症患儿的静脉镇静剂。 SLEEPS研究（小儿重症监护镇静的安全性，功效和等效性）

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Health technology assessment: HTA》 |2014年第71期|共页
作者
Wolf?A; McKay?A; Spowart?C; Granville?H; Boland?A; Petrou?S; Sutherland?A; Gamble?C;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类放射卫生;
关键词
入库时间 2022-08-18 15:31:13

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. Correction: The CLOSED trial; CLOnidine compared with midazolam for SEDation of paediatric patients in the intensive care unit: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial,The CLOSED trial; CLOnidine compared with midazolam for SEDation o [J] . BMJ Open . 2017,第11期

机译：更正：CLOSED试用;重症监护病房的小儿患者SED镇静使用CLOnidine与Midazolam进行比较：一项多中心随机对照试验（CLOSED试验）的研究方案;可乐定与咪达唑仑的镇静作用比较
2. The CLOSED trial; CLOnidine compared with midazolam for SEDation of paediatric patients in the intensive care unit: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial,Correction: The CLOSED trial; CLOnidine compared with midazolam for SEDation o [J] . Tuuli Metsvaht, Joost van Rosmalen, Pavla Pokorná, BMJ Open . 2017,第6期

机译：CLOSED试用;重症监护病房的小儿患者SED镇静使用CLOnidine与咪达唑仑比较：一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案，更正：CLOSED试验;可乐定与咪达唑仑的镇静作用比较
3. y Safety and Efficacy of Volatile Anesthetic Agents Compared With Standard Intravenous Midazolam/Propofol Sedation in Ventilated Critical Care Patients: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Prospective Trials [J] . Jerath Angela, Panckhurst Jonathan, Parotto Matte, Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society . 2017,第4期

机译：易挥发性麻醉剂的安全性和疗效与标准静脉内咪达唑仑/异丙酚镇静的通风危重护理患者：治疗前瞻性试验的荟萃分析和系统审查
4. Prospective multicentre randomised double-blind equivalence study comparing clonidine and midazolam as intravenous sedative agents in critically ill children: the SLEEPS (Safety profiLe Efficacy and Equivalence in Paediatric intensive care Sedation) study. [O] . Andrew Wolf, Andrew McKay, Catherine Spowart, -1

机译：前瞻性多中心双盲等效性研究比较了可乐定和咪达唑仑作为危重症儿童静脉内镇静剂的情况：SLEEPS（小儿重症监护镇静剂的安全性有效性和等效性）研究。
5. The CLOSED trial; CLOnidine compared with midazolam for SEDation of paediatric patients in the intensive care unit: Study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial [O] . Neubert, Antje, Baarslag, Manuel A., Dijk, Monique, 2017

机译：CLOSED试用；重症监护病房中小儿患者镇静用CLOnidine与Midazolam的比较：一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案

Prospective multi-centre randomised, double-blind, equivalence study comparing clonidine and midazolam as intravenous sedative agents in critically ill children. The SLEEPS Study (Safety ProfiLe, Efficacy and Equivalence in Paediatric intensive care Sedation)

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅