首页> 外文期刊>Hans Journal of Data Mining >基于WOS的负面口碑发展之路径分析
【24h】

基于WOS的负面口碑发展之路径分析

机译:基于WOS的负面口碑发展之路径分析

获取原文
           

摘要

通过引文分析和主路径分析的方法,将Web of Science (WOS)数据库中以负面口碑为主题的文献作为研究对象,研究负面口碑的重要文献与逻辑演化路径。研究发现:Richins (1983)的论文是负面口碑领域中最重要的文献之一,而负面口碑的逻辑演化有三条重要路径,分别是:负面口碑行为、负面口碑动机、抱怨和服务补救。 By using the methods of citation analysis and main path analysis, taking the literature with nega-tive word-of-mouth as the research object in the Web of Science (WOS) database, the important literature and logical evolution path of negative word-of-mouth have been studied. The results reveal that the paper of Richins (1983) plays the most important role in negative word-of-mouth field; and there are three important logical evolution routes: behavior of negative word-of-mouth, motive of negative word-of-mouth, complaint and service recovery.
机译:通过引文分析和主路径分析的方法,将Web of Science (WOS)数据库中以负面口碑为主题的文献作为研究对象,研究负面口碑的重要文献与逻辑演化路径。研究发现:Richins (1983)的论文是负面口碑领域中最重要的文献之一,而负面口碑的逻辑演化有三条重要路径,分别是:负面口碑行为、负面口碑动机、抱怨和服务补救。 By using the methods of citation analysis and main path analysis, taking the literature with nega-tive word-of-mouth as the research object in the Web of Science (WOS) database, the important literature and logical evolution path of negative word-of-mouth have been studied. The results reveal that the paper of Richins (1983) plays the most important role in negative word-of-mouth field; and there are three important logical evolution routes: behavior of negative word-of-mouth, motive of negative word-of-mouth, complaint and service recovery.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号