...
首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
【24h】

Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review

机译:绘制患者和公众参与对健康和社会护理研究的影响的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThere is an increasing international interest in patient and public involvement (PPI) in research, yet relatively little robust evidence exists about its impact on health and social care research.ObjectiveTo identify the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research.DesignA systematic search of electronic databases and health libraries was undertaken from 1995 to 2009. Data were extracted and quality assessed utilizing the guidelines of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 2009 and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Grey literature was assessed using the Dixon‐Woods et al. (2005) checklist.Inclusion criteriaAll study types that reported the impact PPI had on the health and/or social care research study.Main resultsA total of 66 studies reporting the impact of PPI on health and social care research were included. The positive impacts identified enhanced the quality and appropriateness of research. Impacts were reported for all stages of research, including the development of user‐focused research objectives, development of user‐relevant research questions, development of user‐friendly information, questionnaires and interview schedules, more appropriate recruitment strategies for studies, consumer‐focused interpretation of data and enhanced implementation and dissemination of study results. Some challenging impacts were also identified.ConclusionThis study provides the first international evidence of PPI impact that has emerged at all key stages of the research process. However, much of the evidence base concerning impact remains weak and needs significant enhancement in the next decade.
机译:背景技术国际上对患者和公众参与(PPI)研究的兴趣日益增加,但关于其对健康和社会护理研究的影响的证据很少,目的是确定患者和公众参与对健康和社会护理研究的影响。从1995年到2009年,对电子数据库和健康图书馆进行了系统的搜索。使用NHS审查与传播中心2009年指南和关键评估技能计划(CASP)提取数据并评估质量。使用Dixon-Woods等人评估了灰色文献。 (2005)清单纳入标准所有报告PPI对健康和/或社会护理研究产生影响的研究类型。主要结果总共包括66篇报告PPI对健康和社会护理研究影响的研究。确定的积极影响提高了研究的质量和适当性。报告了所有研究阶段的影响,包括以用户为中心的研究目标的发展,与用户有关的研究问题的发展,用户友好信息的发展,问卷和访谈时间表,更合适的研究招募策略,以消费者为中心的解释数据,加强研究成果的实施和传播。还确定了一些具有挑战性的影响。结论本研究提供了在研究过程的所有关键阶段出现的PPI影响的第一个国际证据。但是,有关影响的许多证据基础仍然薄弱,在未来十年中需要大幅度提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号