首页> 外文期刊>Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology >US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk
【24h】

US Primary Care Physicians’ Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk

机译:美国初级保健医师的前列腺癌筛查实践:基于小插图的筛查高危男性的分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Limited information exists on primary care physicians’ (PCPs) use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test by patient risk category. We describe PCP responses to hypothetical patient scenario (PS) involving PSA testing among high-risk asymptomatic men.Methods:Data were from the 2007 to 2008 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Practices Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening. PS#1: healthy 55-year-old white male with no family history of prostate cancer; PS#2: healthy 45-year-old African American male with no family history of prostate cancer; and PS#3: healthy 50-year-old male with a family history of prostate cancer. Data were analyzed in SAS/SUDAAN.Results:Most PCPs indicated that they generally discuss the possible benefits/risks of PSA testing with the patient and then recommend the test (PS#1-PS#3 range, 53.4%-68.7%; P .001); only about 1% reported discussing and then recommending against the test. For PS#3, compared to PS#1 and #2, PCPs were more likely to discuss and recommend ...
机译:背景:关于按患者风险类别划分的初级保健医生(PCP)使用前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测试的信息有限。我们描述了PCP对高风险无症状男性中涉及PSA测试的假想患者情景(PS)的反应。方法:数据来自2007年至2008年全国初级保健医师筛查前列腺癌的国家调查。 PS#1:55岁健康的白人男性,无前列腺癌家族史; PS#2:健康的45岁非洲裔美国男性,无前列腺癌家族史;和PS#3:具有前列腺癌家族史的健康50岁男性。结果:大多数PCP指出,他们通常与患者讨论PSA测试的可能益处/风险,然后推荐该测试(PS#1-PS#3范围为53.4%-68.7%; P <.001);只有大约1%的人报告讨论并随后建议不参加测试。对于PS#3,与PS#1和#2相比,PCP更有可能讨论并推荐...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号