...
【24h】

Development and validation of an integrative scale to assess hope

机译:开发和验证用于评估希望的综合量表

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Hope includes the dimensions of time, goals, control, relations and personal characteristics. Existing tools that measure it vary in length and psychometric properties and cover different parts of its overall concept. Objectives This study aimed to develop an instrument that integrates all relevant aspects of hope is concise, easy to use and shows good psychometric properties. Design Three pre‐existing instruments (Miller Hope Scale, Herth Hope Index, Snyder Hope Scale) covering complementary and overlapping aspects of hope were administered cross‐sectionally to a general population sample (n = 489). Factor analysis was used for item reduction. Reliability and validity were tested using factor analysis and item correlations between the new scale and quality of life and depression scales. Setting and participants The study was set in Austria. Participants were sampled from the general population using a quota sampling strategy. Results The initial 60 items were reduced to a 23‐item scale with four dimensions: ‘trust and confidence’, ‘positive future orientation’, ‘social relations and personal value’ and ‘lack of perspective’. The new scale’s factor structure was highly stable and its internal consistency high (alpha = 0.92 for the overall scale, 0.80–0.85 for its subscales). Hope scores were negatively correlated with depression (r = ?0.68) and positively with quality of life (r = 0.57), with the factor analysis and item discriminant validity supporting the new scale’s construct validity. Conclusions The new scale comprehensively covers the concept of hope is significantly shorter than previous scales and shows satisfactory reliability and validity.
机译:背景希望包括时间,目标,控制,关系和个人特征的维度。现有的衡量工具的长度和心理特性各不相同,并且涵盖了其整体概念的不同部分。目标这项研究旨在开发一种工具,该工具整合了希望的所有相关方面,该工具简洁,易用,并显示出良好的心理测量特性。设计对整个人口样本(n = 489)进行横断面管理,涵盖了希望的互补和重叠方面的三种既存工具(米勒希望量表,赫斯希望指数,斯奈德希望量表)。因子分析用于减少项目。使用因素分析和新量表与生活质量和抑郁量表之间的项目相关性,对信度和效度进行了测试。地点和参与者该研究在奥地利进行。使用配额抽样策略从一般人群中抽取参与者。结果最初的60个项目减少到23个项目,其中包括四个维度:“信任和信心”,“积极的未来定位”,“社会关系和个人价值”以及“缺乏视角”。新量表的因子结构高度稳定,内部一致性也很高(总体量表的α= 0.92,子量表的0.80–0.85)。希望得分与抑郁呈负相关(r = 0.68),与生活质量呈正相关(r = 0.57),因子分析和项目判别效度支持新量表的建构效度。结论:新量表全面涵盖了希望的概念,其希望大大低于以前的量表,并显示出令人满意的信度和效度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号