【2h】

Development and validation of an integrative scale to assess hope

机译:开发和验证用于评估希望的综合量表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background  Hope includes the dimensions of time, goals, control, relations and personal characteristics. Existing tools that measure it vary in length and psychometric properties and cover different parts of its overall concept. >Objectives  This study aimed to develop an instrument that integrates all relevant aspects of hope is concise, easy to use and shows good psychometric properties. >Design  Three pre‐existing instruments (Miller Hope Scale, Herth Hope Index, Snyder Hope Scale) covering complementary and overlapping aspects of hope were administered cross‐sectionally to a general population sample (n = 489). Factor analysis was used for item reduction. Reliability and validity were tested using factor analysis and item correlations between the new scale and quality of life and depression scales. >Setting and participants  The study was set in Austria. Participants were sampled from the general population using a quota sampling strategy. >Results  The initial 60 items were reduced to a 23‐item scale with four dimensions: ‘trust and confidence’, ‘positive future orientation’, ‘social relations and personal value’ and ‘lack of perspective’. The new scale’s factor structure was highly stable and its internal consistency high (alpha = 0.92 for the overall scale, 0.80–0.85 for its subscales). Hope scores were negatively correlated with depression (r = −0.68) and positively with quality of life (r = 0.57), with the factor analysis and item discriminant validity supporting the new scale’s construct validity. >Conclusions  The new scale comprehensively covers the concept of hope is significantly shorter than previous scales and shows satisfactory reliability and validity.
机译:>背景希望包括时间,目标,控制力,人际关系和个人特征的维度。现有的衡量工具的长度和心理特性各不相同,涵盖了其整体概念的不同部分。 >目标:这项研究旨在开发一种工具,该工具整合了希望的所有相关方面,这些希望简洁明了,易于使用并且显示出良好的心理计量学特性。 >设计对总体人口样本进行了横截面管理(n = 489),共采用了三种先前存在的工具(米勒希望量表,赫斯希望指数,斯奈德希望量表)。因子分析用于减少项目。使用因素分析和新量表与生活质量和抑郁量表之间的项目相关性来检验信度和效度。 >背景和参与者:这项研究是在奥地利进行的。使用配额抽样策略从一般人群中抽取参与者。 >结果:最初的60项内容缩减为23个项目,其中包括四个维度:“信任和信心”,“积极的未来取向”,“社会关系和个人价值”以及“缺乏洞察力”。新量表的因子结构高度稳定,内部一致性也很高(总体量表的alpha = 0.92,次级量表的0.80-0.85)。希望得分与抑郁呈负相关(r = −0.68),与生活质量呈正相关(r = 0.57),因子分析和项目判别效度支持新量表的建构效度。 >结论新量表全面涵盖了希望的概念,该希望比以前的量表明显短,并显示出令人满意的信度和效度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号