...
首页> 外文期刊>Haematologica >Treatment of severe aplastic anemia with antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine and two different granulocyte colony-stimulating factor regimens: a GITMO prospective randomized study | Haematologica
【24h】

Treatment of severe aplastic anemia with antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine and two different granulocyte colony-stimulating factor regimens: a GITMO prospective randomized study | Haematologica

机译:抗淋巴细胞球蛋白,环孢霉素和两种不同的粒细胞集落刺激因子方案治疗严重再生障碍性贫血:一项GITMO前瞻性随机研究血液学

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In a previous study we showed that patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) treated with anti-lymphocyte globulin (ALG), cyclosporin (CyA) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micro g/kg/day had an encouraging outcome. However, failure to respond, delayed responses, partial responses, relapses and early deaths remain significant problems. The aim of the present study was to test whether a higher dose of G-CSF (10 micro g/kg/day) would reduce these complications. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective trial in 77 SAA patients treated with horse ALG (15 mg/kg/day day1-5) and CyA (5 mg/kg/day day 1-180). Patients were randomized to receive G-CSF 5 micro g/kg/day (n=38, group A) or 10 micro g/kg/day (n=39, group B) from day +1 to day +30. All patients then received G-CSF 5 micro g/kg/day from day +31 to day +90. The primary end point of this study was response at day +120. Secondary end points were early deaths, blood counts at day +120, and survival. RESULTS: At day +120 responses were classified as absent, partial, and complete in 12, 22, and 4 patients in group A and in 23, 7, and 9 patients in group B (p=0.001). At last follow-up these figures were respectively 9, 12, and 17 vs 19, 2, and 18 (p=0.004). Thirteen patients (5 in group A and 8 in group B) died before day 120 (p=0.3). Median peripheral blood counts on day 120 were comparable in the two groups: Hb 10.5 and 9.5 g/dL in group A and B, respectively (p=0.6), Neutrophil counts were 2.4 vs 1.9x10(9)/L in groups A and B (p=0.4) and platelet counts were, respectively, 42 vs 36x10(9)/L (p=0.3). The actuarial survival at 4 years is 72% in group A and 67% in group B (p=0.3). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the dose of G-CSF does not appear to reduce early deaths, does not improve peripheral blood counts nor survival, and may reduce the response rate in patients with SAA receiving ALG and CyA.
机译:背景与目的:在先前的研究中,我们显示,使用抗淋巴细胞球蛋白(ALG),环孢菌素(CyA)和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)治疗的重度再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者为5 micro g / kg /当天的结果令人鼓舞。但是,未能做出反应,反应迟钝,部分反应,复发和早期死亡仍然是严重的问题。本研究的目的是测试更高剂量的G-CSF(10微克/千克/天)是否可以减少这些并发症。设计与方法:这是一项多中心前瞻性试验,研究了77位SAA患者,分别接受马ALG(15 mg / kg /天,第1-5天)和CyA(5 mg / kg /天,第1-180天)治疗。从第+1天到+30天,患者随机接受G-CSF 5微克/千克/天(n = 38,A组)或10微克/千克/天(n = 39,B组)。然后,从第31天到+90天,所有患者均接受5 micro g / kg /天的G-CSF。这项研究的主要终点是在+120天时的反应。次要终点是早期死亡,第120天的血球计数和生存率。结果:在第120天,A组的12、22和4例患者以及B组的23、7和9例患者被分类为不存在,部分和完全应答(p = 0.001)。在最后一次随访中,这些数字分别是9、12和17与19、2和18(p = 0.004)。 13名患者(A组5例,B组8例)在第120天前死亡(p = 0.3)。两组在第120天的外周血中位数相当:A组和B组分别为Hb 10.5和9.5 g / dL(p = 0.6),A组和中性粒细胞计数分别为2.4和1.9x10(9)/ L B(p = 0.4)和血小板计数分别为42 vs 36x10(9)/ L(p = 0.3)。 A组在4年时的精算存活率为72%,B组为67%(p = 0.3)。结论和结论:增加G-CSF的剂量似乎不能减少早期死亡,不能改善外周血细胞计数或存活率,并且可能降低接受ALG和CyA的SAA患者的应答率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号