首页> 外文期刊>Hand >How to Avoid Damaging the Terminal Branches of the Medial Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerve and the Medial Brachial Cutaneous Nerve During Operations Involving the Medial Elbow?
【24h】

How to Avoid Damaging the Terminal Branches of the Medial Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerve and the Medial Brachial Cutaneous Nerve During Operations Involving the Medial Elbow?

机译:在涉及内侧肘的手术中,如何避免损坏前臂上皮神经和臂臂上皮神经的末端分支?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: Medial elbow incision is obligatory for cubital tunnel syndrome surgical treatment. However, the terminal branches of both the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MACN) and the medial brachial cutaneous nerve (MBCN) are likely to be harmed using the current incision technique. The aim of this study was to seek a new incision to avoid damaging the branches of MACN and MBCN during the operation for cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods: Ten fresh frozen cadaver upper extremities and 20 clinical cases (elbows) were analyzed. A conventional incision and a new incision were used in the cadaveric specimens and the clinical cases, respectively. The medial epicondyle was set as the reference landmark to quantify the location of the terminal branches, with the elbow at full extension. The numbers of the terminal branches and their locations were noted for MACN and MBCN, and the locations of the posterior branch of the MACN were recorded in the elbow medial incision. Results: The average numbers of MACN’s posterior terminal branches were 2.6 ± 1.6 and 4.4 ± 2.4 in the cadaveric specimens and clinical cases, respectively. The average number of MBCN’s terminal branches was 2 ± 0.87 in the cadaveric specimens. The MACN’s posterior terminal branches were located at 19 and 45 mm, respectively, measuring from the medial epicondyle. And the posterior branch of MACN was always located in between the medial epicondyle and the basilic vein, and the average distance was 10 ± 6 mm to the medial epicondyle. We could preserve all the MBCN’s terminal branches in the new incision. The MACN’s posterior terminal branches could be perfectly exposed by the use of the antegrade dissection technique, finding the MACN’s posterior branch in advance. Conclusions: The new elbow medial incision technique could reduce the risk of injuring the terminal branches from the MBCN. The medial epicondyle and the basilic vein are reliable anatomical landmarks to identify the posterior branch of the MACN. An antegrade method of dissection can effectively identify and avoid the injury to the terminal branches of the MACN in the elbow medial incision.
机译:目的:肘部内侧切开术必须进行肘管综合征的手术治疗。但是,使用当前的切口技术可能会损伤肱前臂上皮神经(MACN)和肱臂上皮神经(MBCN)的末端分支。本研究的目的是寻找新的切口,以免在肘管综合征手术期间损坏MACN和MBCN的分支。方法:分析十个新鲜冷冻的尸体上肢和20例临床病例(肘部)。尸体标本和临床病例分别采用常规切口和新切口。内侧上con被设置为参考界标,以量化末端分支的位置,肘部完全伸展。记录下MACN和MBCN的末端分支的数目及其位置,并在肘内侧切口中记录MACN的后分支的位置。结果:在尸体标本和临床病例中,MACN后末梢分支的平均数分别为2.6±1.6和4.4±2.4。尸体标本中MBCN末端分支的平均数为2±0.87。 MACN的后末端分支分别位于19毫米和45毫米处,从上media内侧开始测量。 MACN的后分支始终位于内侧上con和基底静脉之间,距内侧上con的平均距离为10±6 mm。我们可以在新切口中保留MBCN的所有终端分支。可以使用顺行解剖技术完美地暴露MACN的后分支,从而提前发现MACN的后分支。结论:新的肘内侧切口技术可以减少MBCN损伤末端分支的风险。内侧上con和基底静脉是可靠的解剖学标志,可识别MACN的后支。顺行解剖方法可以有效地识别并避免肘内侧切口对MACN末端分支的伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号