首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Emergency Surgery >Educational value of surgical videos on YouTube: quality assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy videos by senior surgeons vs. novice trainees
【24h】

Educational value of surgical videos on YouTube: quality assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy videos by senior surgeons vs. novice trainees

机译:YouTube上的手术录像的教育价值:资深外科医师与新手培训的腹腔镜阑尾切除术录像的质量评估

获取原文
           

摘要

To prepare for surgery, surgeons often recur to surgical videos, with YouTube being reported as the preferred source. This study aimed to compare the evaluation of three surgical trainees and three senior surgeons of the 25 most viewed laparoscopic appendectomy videos listed on YouTube. Additionally, we assessed the video conformity to the published guidelines on how to report laparoscopic surgery videos (LAP-VEGaS). Based on the number of visualization, the 25 most viewed videos on laparoscopic appendectomy uploaded on YouTube between 2010 and 2018 were selected. Videos were evaluated on the surgical technical performance (GOALS score), critical view of safety (CVS), and overall video quality and utility. Video image quality was poor for nine (36%) videos, good for nine (36%), and in high definition for seven (28%). Educational content (e.g., audio or written commentary) was rarely present. With the exception of the overall level of difficulty, poor consistency was observed for the GOALS domains between senior surgeons and trainees. Fifteen videos (60%) demonstrated a satisfactory CVS score (≥?5). Concerning the overall video quality, agreement among senior surgeons was higher (Cronbach’s alpha 0.897) than among trainees (Cronbach’s alpha 0.731). The mean overall videos utility (Likert scale, 1 to 5) was 1.92 (SD 0.88) for senior examiners, and 3.24 (SD 1.02) for trainee examiners. The conformity to the LAP-VEGaS guidelines was weak, with a median value of 8.1% (range 5.4–18.9%). Laparoscopic videos represent a useful and appropriate educational tool but they are not sufficiently reviewed to obtained standard quality. A global effort should be made to improve the educational value of the uploaded surgical videos, starting from the application of the nowadays-available LAP-VEGaS guidelines.
机译:为了做好手术准备,外科医生经常会重复观看手术录像,并以YouTube为首选来源。这项研究的目的是比较YouTube上25个观看次数最多的腹腔镜阑尾切除术视频中的3名外科医师和3名高级外科医师的评价。此外,我们评估了视频是否符合已发布的有关如何报告腹腔镜手术视频(LAP-VEGaS)的指南。根据可视化次数,选择了2010年至2018年之间在YouTube上上传的25个观看次数最多的腹腔镜阑尾切除术视频。评估了视频的手术技术性能(目标得分),安全性的关键观点(CVS)以及总体视频质量和实用性。九(36%)个视频的视频图像质量很差,九个(36%)的视频图像质量很差,而七个(28%)的高清图像质量很差。教育内容(例如音频或书面评论)很少出现。除了总体难度,在高级医师和受训者之间的GOALS领域观察到的一致性很差。 15个视频(60%)显示出令人满意的CVS评分(≥5)。关于整体视频质量,高级医生之间的协议(Cronbach的alpha为0.897)高于受训者(Cronbach的alpha为0.731)。高级考官的平均总体视频效用(Likert等级1到5)为1.92(SD 0.88),而见习考官的平均视频效用为3.24(SD 1.02)。 LAP-VEGaS指南的合规性较弱,中位值为8.1%(范围5.4-18.9%)。腹腔镜视频代表了一种有用且适当的教育工具,但没有得到足够的评论以获取标准质量。从应用当今可用的LAP-VEGaS指南开始,应该做出全球性的努力来提高上传的手术视频的教育价值。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号