首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Surgical Oncology >Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer
【24h】

Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer

机译:经乳头状胆道穿刺活检治疗胆道恶性狭窄:胆管癌和胰腺癌的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Tissue sampling for biliary stricture is important for differential diagnosis and further treatment. This study aims to assess the differences of transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Methods From January 2010 to December 2013, we retrospectively studied 79 patients who suffered from biliary strictures and received transpapillary forceps biopsy after sphincterotomy for tissue sampling. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of forceps biopsy were calculated in all cases for both cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer patients. Possible factors that distinguish malignant strictures from benign strictures and which could affect the accuracy of tissue sampling were analyzed. Results There are 65 malignant and 14 benign biliary stricture patients enrolled. The malignant group has a significantly higher serum bilirubin level than the benign group, but age, clinical presentation, level of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, and alkaline phosphatase are not. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of forceps biopsy for biliary stricture are 53.85, 100, 100, and 31.82?%, respectively. The cholangiocarcinoma group has a higher sensitivity (73.53 versus 29.17?%, p 10?mg/dL, tissue sampling ≧ 3 are not significant factors affecting diagnostic accuracy in forceps biopsy for pancreatobiliary strictures. There is neither major bleeding nor perforation in our study. Conclusions Transpapillary forceps biopsy of biliary strictures after sphincterotomy for tissue sampling is safe and a significantly higher sensitive method in cholangiocarcinoma but not in pancreatic cancer.
机译:背景胆道狭窄的组织采样对鉴别诊断和进一步治疗很重要。这项研究的目的是评估胆管癌和胰腺癌的恶性胆道狭窄经乳头穿刺活检的差异。方法回顾性分析2010年1月至2013年12月经鼻括约肌切开术后胆道狭窄并经乳头钳活检的79例患者的组织样本。在所有病例中,均对胆管癌和胰腺癌患者进行了活检的诊断敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。分析了将恶性狭窄与良性狭窄区分开来并可能影响组织采样准确性的可能因素。结果共纳入65例恶性胆道狭窄患者和14例。恶性组的血清胆红素水平明显高于良性组,但年龄,临床表现,血清癌胚抗原(CEA),糖类抗原(CA)19-9和碱性磷酸酶水平却不高。镊子活检对胆道狭窄的敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为53.85%,100%,100%和31.82%。胆管癌组的敏感性更高(73.53比29.17%,p 10µmg / dL,组织取样≥3并不是影响胰胆管狭窄钳活检诊断准确性的重要因素,在我们的研究中既没有大出血也没有穿孔。结论括约肌切开术后胆道狭窄的经乳头钳活检以进行组织取样是安全的,并且对胆管癌的敏感性更高,但对胰腺癌的敏感性更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号