首页> 外文期刊>Gut and Liver >Prospective Comparison of Intraductal Ultrasonography-Guided Transpapillary Biopsy and Conventional Biopsy on Fluoroscopy in Suspected Malignant Biliary Strictures
【24h】

Prospective Comparison of Intraductal Ultrasonography-Guided Transpapillary Biopsy and Conventional Biopsy on Fluoroscopy in Suspected Malignant Biliary Strictures

机译:疑似恶性胆管狭窄的导管内超声引导下经乳头穿刺活检与常规活检透视比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background/Aims In suspected malignant biliary strictures (MBSs), the diagnostic yield of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based tissue sampling is limited. Transpapillary forceps biopsy (TPB) under intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) guidance is expected to improve the diagnostic accuracy in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures. We evaluated the usefulness of IDUS-guided TPB in patients with suspected MBS. Methods Consecutive patients with suspected MBS were prospectively enrolled in the study. ERCP with IDUS was performed in all patients. Both conventional TPB and IDUS-guided TPB on fluoroscopy were performed in each patient. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of conventional TPB and IDUS-guided TPB. Results The technical success rate of IDUS-guided TPB was 97.0% (65/67 patients). Of these 65 patients, the final diagnosis was malignancy in 61 patients (93.8%). On IDUS, the most common finding of IDUS was an intraductal infiltrating lesion in 29 patients (47.5%). The overall diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher using IDUS-guided TPB than that using conventional TPB (90.8% vs 76.9%, p=0.027). According to the subgroup analysis based on the tumor morphology, IDUS-guided TPB had a significantly higher cancer detection rate than conventional TPB for intraductal infiltrating lesions (89.6% vs 65.5%, p=0.028). Conclusions IDUS-guided TPB appears to improve the accuracy of histological diagnosis in patients with MBS.
机译:背景/目的在可疑的恶性胆道狭窄(MBS)中,基于内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的组织采样的诊断率有限。导管内超声检查(IDUS)指导下的经乳头钳活检(TPB)有望改善不确定的胆道狭窄患者的诊断准确性。我们评估了IDUS引导的TPB在疑似MBS患者中的有效性。方法前瞻性入组连续性疑似MBS的患者。所有患者均进行了IDUS ERCP手术。对每位患者均进行了传统的TPB和IDUS引导的TPB透视检查。主要结果是常规TPB和IDUS指导的TPB的诊断准确性。结果IDUS引导的TPB的技术成功率为97.0%(65/67例患者)。在这65例患者中,最终诊断为61例(93.8%)为恶性。在IDUS上,IDUS的最常见发现是29例(47.5%)的导管内浸润性病变。使用IDUS引导的TPB的总体诊断准确度显着高于使用传统TPB的诊断准确度(90.8%vs 76.9%,p = 0.027)。根据基于肿瘤形态的亚组分析,IDUS引导的TPB对于导管内浸润性病变的癌症检出率显着高于传统TPB(89.6%vs 65.5%,p = 0.028)。结论IDUS引导的TPB似乎可以提高MBS患者组织学诊断的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号