...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Alternatives: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Water Politics and Development >Reimagining spaces of innovation for water efficiency and demand management: An exploration of professional practices in the English water sector
【24h】

Reimagining spaces of innovation for water efficiency and demand management: An exploration of professional practices in the English water sector

机译:重塑创新的空间,以提高用水效率和需求管理:探索英国水行业的专业实践

获取原文
           

摘要

Social practice theories have established an important counter narrative to conventional accounts of demand. The core argument of this body of research is that, having focused on informing and incentivising behavioural change, demand management has largely neglected the social and material dimensions of everyday action that shape how and why resources are used. Despite making a compelling case for reframing demand management, there is limited evidence of practice-based approaches having gained a foothold in policy and business practices. This raises important questions regarding how and why certain modes of intervention are pursued at the expense of others and, more broadly, the factors that shape the pace and direction of innovation in demand management. In this paper we turn a practice-lens towards the professional practices of demand management. Using mixed methods, we demonstrate how specific modes of intervention emerge as priorities within a social, political, semiotic and material landscape of professional practice. Our empirical analysis highlights four particular contingencies of demand management that constrain the scope of interventions pursued. These are industry expectations and ideals; modes of collaboration; processes of evidencing action; and hydrosocial disturbances. We discuss the implications of these findings, making suggestions as to how innovation in the practices of demand management might be facilitated, and the role of academic research in this process.
机译:社会实践理论已经建立了与常规需求解释的重要对立叙述。该研究机构的核心论点是,在关注于告知和激励行为改变之后,需求管理在很大程度上忽略了决定如何使用资源以及为什么使用资源的日常行为的社会和物质层面。尽管为重新定义需求管理提供了令人信服的理由,但很少有证据表明基于实践的方法已在政策和商业实践中立足。这就提出了一些重要的问题,这些问题涉及如何以及为什么以某些干预方式为代价而牺牲其他干预方式,更广泛地说,是决定需求管理中创新步伐和方向的因素。在本文中,我们将实践镜头转向需求管理的专业实践。使用混合方法,我们演示了特定的干预模式如何在专业实践的社会,政治,符号学和物质环境中作为优先事项出现。我们的经验分析强调了需求管理的四种特殊情况,它们限制了所采取的干预措施的范围。这些是行业的期望和理想;合作方式;证明行动的过程;和水社会的干扰。我们讨论了这些发现的含义,并就如何促进需求管理实践中的创新以及在这一过程中学术研究的作用提出了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号