...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Undertriage of Trauma-Related Deaths in U.S. Emergency Departments
【24h】

Undertriage of Trauma-Related Deaths in U.S. Emergency Departments

机译:美国急诊部门与创伤相关的死亡未成年人

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Accurate field triage of critically injured patients to trauma centers is vital for improving survival. We sought to estimate the national degree of undertriage of trauma patients who die in emergency departments (EDs) by evaluating the frequency and characteristics associated with triage to non-trauma centers. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of adult ED trauma deaths in the 2010 National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). The primary outcome was appropriate triage to a trauma center (Level I, II or III) or undertriage to a non-trauma center. We subsequently focused on urban areas given improved access to trauma centers. We evaluated the associations of patient demographics, hospital region and mechanism of injury with triage to a trauma versus non-trauma center using multivariable logistic regression. Results: We analyzed 3,971 included visits, representing 18,464 adult ED trauma-related deaths nationally. Of all trauma deaths, nearly half (44.5%, 95%CI [43.0-46.0]) of patients were triaged to non-trauma centers. In a subgroup analysis, over a third of urban ED visits (35.6%, 95% CI [34.1-37.1]) and most rural ED visits (86.4%, 95% CI [81.5-90.1]) were triaged to non-trauma centers. In urban EDs, female patients were less likely to be triaged to trauma centers versus non-trauma centers (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.83, 95% CI [0.70-0.99]). Highest median household income zip codes (≥$67,000) were less likely to be triaged to trauma centers than lowest median income ($1-40,999) (OR 0.54, 95% CI [0.43-0.69]). Compared to motor vehicle trauma, firearm trauma had similar odds of being triaged to a trauma center (OR 0.90, 95%CI [0.71-1.14]); however, falls were less likely to be triaged to a trauma center (OR 0.50, 95%CI [0.38-0.66]). Conclusion: We found that nearly half of all trauma patients nationally and one-third of urban trauma patients, who died in the ED, were triaged to non-trauma centers, and thus undertriaged. Sex and other demographic disparities associated with this triage decision represent targeted opportunities to improve our trauma systems and reduce undertriage.
机译:简介:将重伤患者准确地分流到创伤中心对于提高生存率至关重要。我们试图通过评估与非创伤中心分诊相关的频率和特征来估计在急诊科(ED)死亡的创伤患者的全国未足分类程度。方法:这是对2010年美国国家急诊部门样本(NEDS)中成人ED创伤死亡的回顾性横断面分析。主要结局是适当分流至创伤中心(I,II或III级)或未分流至非创伤中心。随后,由于有更多机会进入创伤中心,我们将重点放在城市地区。我们使用多变量logistic回归评估了患者人口统计资料,医院区域和伤残分类机制与创伤与非创伤中心的关系。结果:我们分析了3,971例入院访视,代表全国18,464例成人ED创伤相关死亡。在所有创伤死亡中,将近一半(44.5%,95%CI [43.0-46.0])患者分流到非创伤中心。在亚组分析中,超过三分之一的城市急诊就诊(35.6%,95%CI [34.1-37.1])和大多数农村急诊就诊(86.4%,95%CI [81.5-90.1])被分类到非创伤中心。在城市急诊室,女性患者被分诊到创伤中心和非创伤中心的可能性较小(调整后的优势比[OR] 0.83,95%CI [0.70-0.99])。与最低中位收入(1-40,999美元)相比,最高中位家庭邮政编码(≥67,000美元)被分诊到创伤中心的可能性较小(OR 0.54,95%CI [0.43-0.69])。与机动车创伤相比,枪支创伤被分类到创伤中心的几率相似(OR 0.90,95%CI [0.71-1.14]);但是,跌倒不太可能被分类到创伤中心(OR 0.50,95%CI [0.38-0.66])。结论:我们发现,在全国急诊室死亡的所有创伤患者中,有近一半是城市创伤患者,三分之一是在非创伤中心进行了分类,因此分类不足。与该分诊决定相关的性别差异和其他人口统计学差异,是有针对性的机会,可以改善我们的创伤系统并减少分类不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号