...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Does Targeted Education of Emergency Physicians Improve Their Comfort Level in Treating Psychiatric Patients?
【24h】

Does Targeted Education of Emergency Physicians Improve Their Comfort Level in Treating Psychiatric Patients?

机译:对急诊医师进行有针对性的教育是否可以提高他们在治疗精神病患者方面的舒适度?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: We determined if targeted education of emergency physicians (EPs)regarding the treatment of mental illness will improve their comfort level in treatingpsychiatric patients boarding in the emergency department (ED) awaiting admission. Methods: We performed a pilot study examining whether an educational interventionwould change an EP’s comfort level in treating psychiatric boarder patients (PBPs). Weidentified a set of psychiatric emergencies that typically require admission or treatmentbeyond the scope of practice of emergency medicine. Diagnoses included majordepression, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar affective disorder, generalanxiety disorder, suicidal ideation, and criminal behavior. We designed equivalentsurveys to be used before and after an educational intervention. Each survey consistedof 10 scenarios of typical psychiatric patients. EPs were asked to rate their comfort levelsin treating the described patients on a visual analogue scale. We calculated summaryscores for the non intervention survey group (NINT) and intervention survey group (INT)and compared them using Student’s t-test. Results: Seventy-nine percent (33/42) of eligible participants completed the preinterventionsurvey (21 attendings, 12 residents) and comprised the NINT group. Fiftyfivepercent (23/42) completed the post-intervention survey (16 attendings, 7 residents)comprising the INT group. A comparison of summary scores between ‘NINT’ and ‘INT’groups showed a highly significant improvement in comfort levels with treating thepatients described in the scenarios (P = 0.003). Improvements were noted on separateanalysis for faculty (P = 0.039) and for residents (P = 0.012). Results of a sensitivityanalysis excluding one highly significant scenario showed decreased, but still importantdifferences between the NINT and INT groups for all participants and for residents, butnot for faculty (all: P = 0.05; faculty: P = 0.25; residents: P = 0.03). Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that the comfort level of EPs, when asked to treatPBPs, may be improved with education. We believe our data support further study of thisidea and of whether an improved comfort level will translate to a willingness to treat.[West J Emerg Med. 2012;13(6):453-457].
机译:简介:我们确定针对精神病治疗的急诊医师(EPs)的有针对性的教育是否会提高他们在等待入院急诊室(ED)住院的精神病患者的舒适度。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,研究了教育干预措施是否会改变EP在治疗精神病寄宿生患者(PBP)中的舒适度。我们确定了一组急诊实践以外通常需要入院或治疗的精神病紧急情况。诊断包括严重抑郁症,精神分裂症,精神分裂症,双相情感障碍,普通焦虑症,自杀意念和犯罪行为。我们设计了在教育干预之前和之后要使用的等效调查。每个调查包括10种典型精神病患者的情景。要求EP在视觉模拟量表上评估他们在描述患者中的舒适度。我们计算了非干预调查组(NINT)和干预调查组(INT)的摘要分数,并使用Student's t检验进行了比较。结果:百分之九十九(33/42)的合格参与者完成了干预前的调查(有21位参与者,12位居民),并组成了NINT组。百分之五十五(23/42)完成了干预后的调查(包括INT组)(16人参加,7名居民)。比较“ NINT”组和“ INT”组的总体得分,可以发现情景中描述的治疗患者的舒适度有了显着提高(P = 0.003)。在教职员工(P = 0.039)和居民(P = 0.012)的单独分析中,有改进。敏感性分析的结果(不包括一种高度显着的情况)显示,NINT和INT组之间的差异对于所有参与者和居民而言都是重要的,但对于教师而言并非如此(所有:P = 0.05;教师:P = 0.25;居民:P = 0.03) 。结论:这项初步研究表明,当被要求治疗PBP时,通过教育可以提高EP的舒适度。我们相信我们的数据支持对该想法以及舒适度水平的提高是否将转化为治疗意愿的进一步研究。[West J Emerg Med。 2012; 13(6):453-457]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号