首页> 外文期刊>Virology Journal >Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
【24h】

Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses

机译:与多种呼吸道病毒快速诊断诊断试剂盒相比,定制多重实时RT-PCR的评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Severe acute respiratory infections in children can be fatal, rapid identification of the causative agent and timely treatment can be life saving. Multiplex real time RT-PCR helps in simultaneous detection of multiple viruses saving cost, time and labour. Commercially available multiplex real time RT-PCR kits are very expensive. Therefore the aim of the present study was to develop a cost effective multiplex real time RT-PCR for the detection of 18 respiratory viruses and compare it with an in-vitro diagnostics approved Fast Track Diagnostic Respiratory Pathogens 21 Kit (FTD). Methods Nasopharyngeal aspirates and throat swabs were collected and processed for extraction of nucleic acid using an automated extraction system and multiplex real time RT-PCR was performed using the FTD kit and a custom assay on 356 samples. Results Custom and FTD assays detected one or more respiratory viruses in 268 (75.29?%) and 262 (73.60?%) samples respectively. The concordance between the custom assay and the FTD assay was 100?% for HCoV OC43, HCoV 229E, HPIV-1, HPIV-2, HBoV, HPeV, Flu A, and Influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 and 94.66 – 99.71?% for the remaining viruses; Flu B (99.71?%), HRV (99.71?%), HPIV-3 (98.87?%), HPIV-4 (99.43?%), HCoV NL63 (99.71?%), HMPV A/B (99.71?%), RSV A/B (94.66?%), EV (98.31?%), HCoV HKU1 (99.71?%), HAdV (99.71?%). Major discrepancy was observed for RSV A/B, which was over detected in 18 samples by the custom assay as compared to the FTD assay. The custom assay was much cheaper than the FTD assay and the time taken was only 29?min more. Conclusion The custom primer and probe mix was found to be comparable to the FTD assay with good concordance but was much cheaper and the time taken for reporting was only 29?min more. The low cost custom multiplex RT-PCR can be a useful alternative to the costly FTD kit for rapid identification of viral aetiology in resource limited settings.
机译:背景技术儿童严重的急性呼吸道感染可能是致命的,迅速确定病因并及时治疗可以挽救生命。多重实时RT-PCR有助于同时检测多种病毒,从而节省了成本,时间和劳力。市售的多重实时RT-PCR试剂盒非常昂贵。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种经济有效的多重实时RT-PCR,用于检测18种呼吸道病毒,并将其与体外诊断批准的快速通道诊断性呼吸道病原菌21试剂盒(FTD)进行比较。方法收集鼻咽抽吸物和咽拭子,并使用自动提取系统进行处理以提取核酸,并使用FTD试剂盒和定制分析法对356个样品进行多重实时RT-PCR。结果Custom和FTD分析分别在268个样本(75.29%)和262个样本(73.60 %%)中检测到一种或多种呼吸道病毒。对于HCoV OC43,HCoV 229E,HPIV-1,HPIV-2,HBoV,HPeV,Flu A和A型流感(H1N1)pdm09,常规测定与FTD测定之间的一致性为100%,对于HCoV OC43,HCoV 229E,HPIV-1,HPIV-2,HBoV,HPeV,Flu A和A.其余的病毒;流感B(99.71%),HRV(99.71%),HPIV-3(98.87%),HPIV-4(99.43%),HCoV NL63(99.71%),HMPV A / B(99.71%) ,RSV A / B(94.66%),EV(98.31%),HCoV HKU1(99.71%),HAdV(99.71%)。观察到RSV A / B的主要差异,与FTD分析相比,通过自定义分析在18个样品中过度检测到。定制检测比FTD检测便宜得多,花费的时间仅多29分钟。结论发现定制引物和探针混合物可以与FTD分析相媲美,一致性好,但价格便宜得多,报告时间仅增加29分钟。低成本的定制多重RT-PCR可以替代昂贵的FTD试剂盒,从而在资源有限的环境中快速鉴定病毒病因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号